If a rock is dropped off a sea cliff


by kbrowne29
Tags: cliff, dropped, rock
kbrowne29
kbrowne29 is offline
#1
Oct6-03, 04:05 PM
P: 12
If a rock is dropped off a sea cliff, and the sound of it striking the water is heard 3.4 seconds later, how high is the cliff, assuming the speed of sound to be 340 m/s.
I don't really know where to begin with this one, and I would really appreciate the help. Thanks.
Phys.Org News Partner Physics news on Phys.org
The hemihelix: Scientists discover a new shape using rubber bands (w/ video)
Mapping the road to quantum gravity
Chameleon crystals could enable active camouflage (w/ video)
mathman
mathman is offline
#2
Oct6-03, 06:24 PM
Sci Advisor
P: 5,941
3 equations in 3 unknowns. You do the algebra.

1) h=gs2/2
2) h=vt
3) s+t=3.4

Symbols:
h=height of cliff
g=gravitational constant (9.83 m/s2)
s=time for rock to fall
t=time for sound to come back to you
v=speed of sound (340 m/s)

(h,s,t) are unknowns.
kbrowne29
kbrowne29 is offline
#3
Oct6-03, 07:45 PM
P: 12
Thanks for the help. As I said before, my difficulty lay in not being able to start the problem, and now I know where I must begin. Thanks again for helping me out.

lavalamp
lavalamp is offline
#4
Oct18-03, 07:39 PM
lavalamp's Avatar
P: 280

If a rock is dropped off a sea cliff


It's intersting that your value for g is 9.83. Was that a typo or is that what you've been given. I've always been told that it was 9.81.
Pandemonium
Pandemonium is offline
#5
Oct19-03, 01:26 AM
P: 29
You live in England, so the gravitational acceleration there is 9.81 m s-2. In other places the value of g is different, due to the fact that Earth is not a perfect sphere.

Where I live, in Singapore which is near the equator, the value of g is 9.78 m s-2, although in classrooms we use 9.81 m s-2 because the public education here prepares us for Cambridge papers.
lavalamp
lavalamp is offline
#6
Oct19-03, 01:32 AM
lavalamp's Avatar
P: 280
I know that the earth is not a perfect sphere, and that invariably gravity will vary. But I thought that 9.81 was an average figure denoted by SI. After all, they set the standard units for everything else so why not a standard value for g aswell.
Pandemonium
Pandemonium is offline
#7
Oct19-03, 07:15 AM
P: 29
Hmmm... I've never thought of that. I don't know...
Adrian Baker
Adrian Baker is offline
#8
Oct21-03, 06:52 AM
Adrian Baker's Avatar
P: 419
Originally posted by lavalamp
I know that the earth is not a perfect sphere, and that invariably gravity will vary. But I thought that 9.81 was an average figure denoted by SI. After all, they set the standard units for everything else so why not a standard value for g aswell.
Because the other things that they set values for are constants (or are believed to be), whereas 'g' certainly isn't. If I measure 'g'in the lab, I want to find the value of it, not see how close I am to some arbitrary average decided on by a committee.
[:)]
HallsofIvy
HallsofIvy is offline
#9
Oct23-03, 11:00 AM
Math
Emeritus
Sci Advisor
Thanks
PF Gold
P: 38,900
g is not an arbitrary unit like "1 kg" or "1 meter". It is a "constant of nature" and the correct value, to the necessary accuracy, should be used for the position on the earth. Of course, for most applications, 9.81 gives the necessary accuracy. (And, in fact, 9.8 works nicely most of the time.)
russ_watters
russ_watters is online now
#10
Oct24-03, 01:03 AM
Mentor
P: 22,008
I hadn't realized it changed so much so I looked it up. The difference is a combination of distance from the center of the earth and centrifugal force. I don't feel like doing the math right now on exactly how much of it is due to each.
lavalamp
lavalamp is offline
#11
Oct24-03, 09:31 AM
lavalamp's Avatar
P: 280
The formulae is:

F' = GMm
---
r^2

F' is the force of attraction between two point masses of M and m.
G is the gravitational constant (6.67*10^24).
r is the distance between the two point masses.

You could take account of the fact that we're trying to mave in a straihg line and the earth is pulling us round in a circle if you wanted to, but this effect would be smal when you take account of the radius of the earth: 40,000,000/(2[pi]), nevertheless the formula for that is:

F'' = mr * ω^2

where &omega is the angular velocity, which can be replaced by 2[pi]/T where T is the time persiod 24*3600 (24 hours in seconds), m is your mass by the way:

F'' = mr * 4 * [pi]^2 / (24*3600)^2

So the total resultant force on a mass m, F = F' - F''

Feel free to work out the values if you can be bothered.
Julian Solos
Julian Solos is offline
#12
Jan25-04, 10:18 PM
P: 45
Originally posted by HallsofIvy
g is not an arbitrary unit like "1 kg" or "1 meter". It is a "constant of nature" and the correct value, to the necessary accuracy, should be used for the position on the earth.
Excuse me, but g is not a constant. It is commonly called the acceleration due to gravity, which is related to the Gravitational constant, G. The value of g depends on where it is measured, including the altitude.

Even though g is commonly called the acceleration due to gravity, the measured (and published) value of g at a certain location usually includes the effect due to the rotation of the Earth at the particular location.
PrudensOptimus
PrudensOptimus is offline
#13
Jan25-04, 11:34 PM
P: 640
the height is 578m.

Δy = [(v+v0)/2]t

v = 0, t = 3.4s.
Magg$
Magg$ is offline
#14
Feb2-04, 03:03 PM
P: 19
Its Magg$,

you know, we talked before and you helped me with my coursework...

Only this time I'm talking out of my own interest...

Could you tell me what the Young's Modulus value is for:
Graphite,
Wood,
Steel,
Glass,
Aluminium,
and Titanium...

I know your gonna think this is to help with coursework again because Young's Modulus is part of the AS syllabus but HONESTLY, this is through my own interest as I want more young's modulus values to do some comparisons between materials.

Please Help,

Magg$

P.S, I'm going to a lecture tomorrow about the Physics of Skydiving at Birmingham University, should be good!
selfAdjoint
selfAdjoint is offline
#15
Feb2-04, 03:35 PM
Emeritus
PF Gold
P: 8,147
Here's a site with some of them. You can probably find more with a little judicious googling. I found this one just by googling on Young's Modulus. You should generally try that kind of thing before asking here, because you get the answer quicker and (hem) learn to do independent research.


Register to reply

Related Discussions
Error measurement in time of flight tests Classical Physics 4
Freefall Introductory Physics Homework 2
motion under gravity General Physics 6
Freefall Introductory Physics Homework 3
Freefall Introductory Physics Homework 3