Thread Closed

seeing is different than believing

 
Share Thread Thread Tools
Dec6-07, 04:35 AM   #1
 

seeing is different than believing


what are we seeing the present,the future ,or the past??
 
PhysOrg.com
PhysOrg
science news on PhysOrg.com

>> Hong Kong launches first electric taxis
>> Morocco to harness the wind in energy hunt
>> Galaxy's Ring of Fire
Dec6-07, 06:45 AM   #2
 
Depends what you mean and how you define each. If you consider that to be able to see something means that it has happened (optical trickery aside) then everything is in the past.
 
Dec6-07, 08:46 PM   #3
 
Quote by aman malik View Post
what are we seeing the present,the future ,or the past??
If we are talking about celestial objects, definitely the past. Ancient history, in many cases.

If we are talking about things in the same room, there is the latency of the light travelling across the room plus the latency of the whatever happens neurologically between the retina and the occipital cortex, combined for a few nanoseconds.

Are you seeing something you don't believe???
 
Thread Closed
Thread Tools


Similar Threads for: seeing is different than believing
Thread Forum Replies
To the converted atheists: What do you miss from "believing"? General Discussion 150
Any better reasons than this one for not believing in the landscape? Beyond the Standard Model 11