| Thread Closed |
seeing is different than believing |
Share Thread | Thread Tools |
| Dec6-07, 04:35 AM | #1 |
|
|
seeing is different than believing
what are we seeing the present,the future ,or the past??
|
| PhysOrg.com |
science news on PhysOrg.com >> Hong Kong launches first electric taxis >> Morocco to harness the wind in energy hunt >> Galaxy's Ring of Fire |
| Dec6-07, 06:45 AM | #2 |
|
|
Depends what you mean and how you define each. If you consider that to be able to see something means that it has happened (optical trickery aside) then everything is in the past.
|
| Dec6-07, 08:46 PM | #3 |
|
|
If we are talking about things in the same room, there is the latency of the light travelling across the room plus the latency of the whatever happens neurologically between the retina and the occipital cortex, combined for a few nanoseconds. Are you seeing something you don't believe??? |
| Thread Closed |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads for: seeing is different than believing
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | ||
| To the converted atheists: What do you miss from "believing"? | General Discussion | 150 | ||
| Any better reasons than this one for not believing in the landscape? | Beyond the Standard Model | 11 | ||