Wavepacket vs. wavefunction


by Alice Jin
Tags: wavefunction, wavepacket
Alice Jin
Alice Jin is offline
#1
Oct20-08, 06:48 PM
P: 18
Dear,

I have a trouble understanding QM.
What's the difference between wavepacket and wavefunction?
Can we use a wavepacket for a particle in a box?
Please reply to this questions.
Thank you in advance.
Phys.Org News Partner Physics news on Phys.org
Physicists design quantum switches which can be activated by single photons
'Dressed' laser aimed at clouds may be key to inducing rain, lightning
Higher-order nonlinear optical processes observed using the SACLA X-ray free-electron laser
ice109
ice109 is offline
#2
Oct20-08, 08:42 PM
P: 1,705
a wavepacket is a wavefunction which is localized, meaning really high in some small region and small everywhere else. a wavefunction is just slang for a solution to the shrodinger eqn.

here's a wavepacket



see how it's really high around x=0 and hence it's square, which is the probability amplitude, in a very small range and zero everywhere else. hence the particle which this wave packet describes is most likely to have energy around x=0. therefore the energy is in some sense localized.

here's another wave function



the range of values where it's high, and hence it's probability amplitude is high, is just plain weird. hence you couldn't say it's energy is localized.

really there's no difference between the two, it's slang. so if you want you can call the solution to the shrodinger eqn for a particle in a box a wavepacket, bob, or whatever you want- as long as you write down the correct mathematical formula.
olgranpappy
olgranpappy is offline
#3
Oct20-08, 09:18 PM
HW Helper
olgranpappy's Avatar
P: 1,273
Quote Quote by Alice Jin View Post
Dear,

I have a trouble understanding QM.
What's the difference between wavepacket and wavefunction?
Can we use a wavepacket for a particle in a box?
Please reply to this questions.
Thank you in advance.
uhh... didn't you just ask this same question here:

http://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=265538

Alice Jin
Alice Jin is offline
#4
Oct20-08, 10:57 PM
P: 18

Wavepacket vs. wavefunction


Yeah, I did. But I'm not quiet sure about the wavepacket. That's why I asked different subject. Also I think it's different thing.
ice109
ice109 is offline
#5
Oct21-08, 12:21 AM
P: 1,705
well do you understand my answer?
Alice Jin
Alice Jin is offline
#6
Oct21-08, 10:32 AM
P: 18
Thanks, ice109.

What you're saying is that the wavepacket has more or less localized energy at the average position even though the wavepacket is composed of lots of different momenta and for the wavefuction I can consider it like the excited state of paticle in a box. Right?
Am I understood?
ice109
ice109 is offline
#7
Oct21-08, 05:33 PM
P: 1,705
Quote Quote by Alice Jin View Post
Thanks, ice109.

What you're saying is that the wavepacket has more or less localized energy at the average position even though the wavepacket is composed of lots of different momenta and for the wavefuction I can consider it like the excited state of paticle in a box. Right?
Am I understood?
you are understood but you've misunderstood me. so first tell me what is your native language and what level of quantum mechanics are you studying?


Register to reply

Related Discussions
Why wavepacket? Quantum Physics 6
spreading wavepacket Quantum Physics 8
Uncertainty in the wavepacket Advanced Physics Homework 2
Can photon form wavepackets? Quantum Physics 4