Speed of light derived from Planck constant?


by zeusgm
Tags: light, planck
zeusgm
zeusgm is offline
#1
Sep26-10, 05:10 PM
P: 1
I was wondering if the speed of light (c) can be derived from Planck's constant (h) or the opposite way.

I know that they are both fundamental constants, but I'm sure they are connected somehow.

Saying it on a different way: if Planck's constant would be different, would the speed of light change?

Which would be the way on how to proceed for a hypothetical proof?
Phys.Org News Partner Physics news on Phys.org
Better thermal-imaging lens from waste sulfur
Scientists observe quantum superconductor-metal transition and superconducting glass
New technique detects microscopic diabetes-related eye damage
Dmitry67
Dmitry67 is offline
#2
Sep27-10, 02:12 AM
Dmitry67's Avatar
P: 2,456
The name ‘fundamental constants’ is misleading; G, h and c are not constants at all: in the Fundamental Planks units G=h=c=1. But you can vary parameters of the standard model instead.
arkajad
arkajad is offline
#3
Sep28-10, 02:52 AM
P: 1,412
It can be "derived" if one day in the future we will understand why the fine structure constant is dimensionless and why its value is close to 1/137. But asking such questions is being strongly discouraged by what is known as "mainstream physics". Once upon a time Princeton physicists (Dyson) were interested in these questions, but they are not for an ordinary folk to ask.

Dmitry67
Dmitry67 is offline
#4
Sep28-10, 02:54 AM
Dmitry67's Avatar
P: 2,456

Speed of light derived from Planck constant?


fine structure constant is part of parameters of dimensionless parameters of the Standard model. It is not very special - there are many other dimensionless constants.
arkajad
arkajad is offline
#5
Sep28-10, 03:09 AM
P: 1,412
Quote Quote by Dmitry67 View Post
fine structure constant is part of parameters of dimensionless parameters of the Standard model. It is not very special - there are many other dimensionless constants.
Perhaps for you, and for others that are happy with the standard model, it is not very special. For Pauli it was, for Feynman it was, for Dyson it was. Perhaps it will be such for someone in the future - why not to keep such a possibility in mind as a working hypothesis that is waiting for a verification?


Register to reply

Related Discussions
Planck length and the speed of light Quantum Physics 1
Speed of light constant Special & General Relativity 5
Large Extra Dims and a derived Planck Mass Beyond the Standard Model 7
Is the speed of light constant? Special & General Relativity 42
Planck mass; time; length derived out of air? Quantum Physics 5