New Reply

How should we understand "control the voltage, not the current"?

 
Share Thread Thread Tools
Feb2-12, 11:18 AM   #1
 

How should we understand "control the voltage, not the current"?


And provide "roundabout" for spikes? I mean seriously, isn't V and A closely related? You regulate one, you end up regulate both?
PhysOrg.com
PhysOrg
engineering news on PhysOrg.com

>> PNNL-developed injection molding process recognized with emerging technologies award
>> How soon could car seats enter the 3-D comfort zone?
>> NASA: Austin, calling Austin. 3-D pizzas to go
Feb2-12, 11:42 AM   #2
 
No, when you regulate the voltage you end up with constant voltage not the current.
Simply ohms law I = V/R
Despite the fact that we have a voltage which does not change, but the load current will change as load resistance is changing.
For V=10 and load resistance change from 1K to 100R causes the change in load current from 100mA to 10mA. Despite the fact that the voltage doesn't change at all.
New Reply
Thread Tools


Similar Threads for: How should we understand "control the voltage, not the current"?
Thread Forum Replies
In binary can we have a value with "deci" "centi" "mili" or more lower valued prefix? Computers 14
Amount of current and voltage in an average "shock" from a door nob? General Physics 3
What is the difference between "Bias" voltage and "Gate" voltage? Classical Physics 1
Help me Understand "Closed Under Addition" and "Closed Under Multiplication" Calculus & Beyond Homework 2
control creation time of light "particles" High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics 6