| New Reply |
How should we understand "control the voltage, not the current"? |
Share Thread | Thread Tools |
| Feb2-12, 11:18 AM | #1 |
|
|
How should we understand "control the voltage, not the current"?
And provide "roundabout" for spikes? I mean seriously, isn't V and A closely related? You regulate one, you end up regulate both?
|
| Feb2-12, 11:42 AM | #2 |
|
|
No, when you regulate the voltage you end up with constant voltage not the current.
Simply ohms law I = V/R Despite the fact that we have a voltage which does not change, but the load current will change as load resistance is changing. For V=10 and load resistance change from 1K to 100R causes the change in load current from 100mA to 10mA. Despite the fact that the voltage doesn't change at all. |
| New Reply |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads for: How should we understand "control the voltage, not the current"?
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | ||
| In binary can we have a value with "deci" "centi" "mili" or more lower valued prefix? | Computers | 14 | ||
| Amount of current and voltage in an average "shock" from a door nob? | General Physics | 3 | ||
| What is the difference between "Bias" voltage and "Gate" voltage? | Classical Physics | 1 | ||
| Help me Understand "Closed Under Addition" and "Closed Under Multiplication" | Calculus & Beyond Homework | 2 | ||
| control creation time of light "particles" | High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics | 6 | ||