Register to reply 
How to incorporate spin into the wavefunction? 
Share this thread: 
#1
Nov1812, 06:13 AM

P: 356

I'm currently reading the Griffith book and he dosen't really explain this, do i just miltiply the spin kets with the wave function??



#2
Nov1812, 07:54 AM

Sci Advisor
HW Helper
P: 11,896

I'd go for less mathematics this time:
Yes, the spin dof do not interfere with the coordinate dof which are used in the normal wavefunction,(= a spin 0 wavefunction), that's why there's a multiplication of the spin ket (a 1column matrix with 2, 3, 4, etc. components) with a wavefunction depending on x,y,z (or px,py,pz if working in the momentum representation). 


#3
Nov1812, 10:02 AM

P: 1,020

In non relativistic quantum mechanics spin is introduced in a rather ad hoc manner and by solving the schrodinger eqn for say hydrogen atom one can introduce all quantum numbers but spin.Spin was introduced as another degree of freedom because it can not be obtained from schrodinger eqn.However pauli introduced it for spin 1/2 by noting that p^{2} can be written as (σ.p)(σ.p),but it is still artificial.The logical way of introducing it was done by dirac for spin 1/2.



#4
Nov1812, 10:17 AM

Sci Advisor
HW Helper
P: 11,896

How to incorporate spin into the wavefunction?
Nonrelativistic particles and wave equations JeanMarc LévyLeblond; 286311 Commun. math. Phys. 6, 286—311 (1967) Page 289, to be precise. http://projecteuclid.org/DPubS?servi...cmp/1103840276 


#5
Nov1812, 01:17 PM

P: 1,020

I was saying it in historical way,nevertheless the reference you have given accepts the dirac original view to make a nonrelativistic version of dirac eqn and it is not a logical consequence of Galilean theory because it nevertheless assumes linearity in both time and space derivative which was the original point of dirac in his paper.So i will still call it some way of fixing it,rather than some original motivation on Galilean relativity.



#6
Nov1812, 05:17 PM

Sci Advisor
Thanks
P: 4,160

The Pauli Equation, 1927, is quadratic, not linear, consequently it bears a strong resemblance to the Schrodinger Equation but not Dirac. Furthermore it was not advertised as a "nonrelativistic version" of the Dirac Equation, which was introduced in 1928, a year later.



#7
Nov1912, 11:49 AM

Sci Advisor
HW Helper
P: 11,896

spin <  Galilean relativity, not only that spin <  Lorentz/Poincaré/Einstein/Minkowski relativity (thing which has been known since 1928). The issue with Galilei relativistic equations vs Lorentz relativistic equations is totally different and I was not addressing it (it's actually a very broad subject). 


Register to reply 
Related Discussions  
How to incorporate professional experience on a CV for phd apps?  Career Guidance  0  
How to incorporate evidence into parameters of a Bayesian network?  Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics  3  
Infinite potential well wavefunction contribution to 'classical' initial wavefunction  Advanced Physics Homework  1  
Spin wavefunction confusion  Quantum Physics  5  
Epidemic models which incorporate disease evolution  Biology  1 