Timoshenko - Euler Bernoulli In Plane Curved Beams

In summary, there are differential equations available for curved in-plane beams, which can be found by searching for "curved beams." There are two types of curved beams to consider: those with a large initial radius compared to cross section dimensions, and those with a small initial radius. Both require modifications to simple straight beam theory. Some notable names associated with this type of curved beam theory include Winkler and Bach, Gibson and Ritchie, Wilson and Quereau, and Dolan and Levin. A document from 2011 provides analytical theory and results for comparison.
  • #1
bugatti79
794
1
Folks,

Searches of Timoshenko and Euler Bernoulli Beam Theory show differential equations for straight beams.

Is there any material out there illustrating differential equations for "curved in plane beams"..?

Thanks
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #2
Yes, there's quite a bit. Google 'curved beams'.
 
  • #3
First and foremost you need to distinguish between beams curved in plan ie those subject to out of plane forces and those initially curved in longitudinal section.

Consideration of torsion is essential with the first type.

I am assuming you mean the second.
This type of beam can be examined under two headings

Those for which the initial Radius is >> the cross section dimensions (small curvature)

Those for which the initial Radius is of the same order as the cross section dimensions (larfe curvature)

Both require variations from simple straight beam theory.

Names associated with this tyype of curved beam theory are

Winkler and Bach
Gibson and Ritchie
Wilson and Quereau
Dolan and Levin

You might find this document (2011) interesting as it lists some analystical theory and some results that you can calibrate your work against.

http://duebjri.pci.org/view_file.cfm?file=JL-80-JULY-AUGUST-11.pdf
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Related to Timoshenko - Euler Bernoulli In Plane Curved Beams

What is the difference between Timoshenko and Euler-Bernoulli beam theory?

The Timoshenko beam theory takes into account the shear deformation and rotational inertia of the beam, while the Euler-Bernoulli beam theory assumes that the beam is long and slender with no shear deformation or rotational inertia.

How do you determine if a beam is considered to be "in-plane" for Timoshenko-Euler Bernoulli beam theory?

In-plane beams are those that bend only in a single plane, meaning that the cross-section of the beam remains unchanged during bending. This is often the case for beams with symmetrical cross-sections, such as rectangular or circular beams.

What are some common applications of Timoshenko-Euler Bernoulli beam theory?

This theory is commonly used in engineering for the analysis of beams subjected to bending and shear, such as in the design of buildings, bridges, and other structures. It is also used in the design of mechanical systems, such as cranes and other lifting equipment.

What are the assumptions made in Timoshenko-Euler Bernoulli beam theory?

The main assumptions are that the beam is initially straight, the beam material is homogeneous and isotropic, and that the beam is subjected to small deformations and displacements. Additionally, the theory assumes that the beam is loaded only in the transverse direction and that the cross-section remains unchanged during bending.

What are some limitations of Timoshenko-Euler Bernoulli beam theory?

This theory is not valid for beams with high shear stresses, thick or non-uniform cross-sections, or beams with large deflections. It also does not take into account the effects of material non-linearity or geometric imperfections, which may be important in some cases.

Similar threads

  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
1
Views
982
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Mechanics
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top