| New Reply |
Cesaro summability implies bounded partial sums |
Share Thread | Thread Tools |
| Feb6-13, 02:53 AM | #1 |
|
|
Cesaro summability implies bounded partial sums
1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
Suppose [itex] c_{n} > 0[/itex] for each [itex] n\geq 0.[/itex] Prove that if [itex]\sum ^{\infty}_{n=0} c_{n}[/itex] is Cesaro summable, then the partial sums [itex] S_{N} [/itex] are bounded. 2. Relevant equations -- 3. The attempt at a solution I tried contraposition; that was getting me nowhere. I have a few inequalities here and there but they don't tell me anything. I need to show that there exists an upperbound for the partial sums. This means there exists a least upperbound. I need to find that least upperbound. Because[itex] c_{n} > 0[/itex] for each [itex] n\geq 0,[/itex] then the series is nondecreasing, which means the partial sums are nondecreasing, so we are looking for an upperbound, not a lowerbound. |
| Feb6-13, 06:34 AM | #2 |
|
|
|
| New Reply |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads for: Cesaro summability implies bounded partial sums
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | ||
| Partial Sums resembling sums of secant hyperbolic | Calculus & Beyond Homework | 0 | ||
| Bounded function implies limit is bounded | Calculus & Beyond Homework | 2 | ||
| Sequences, Cumulative Sums, Partial Sums Plot --- Ti-89 Titanium | Calculators | 0 | ||
| Cesaro summability and Mertens function | Linear & Abstract Algebra | 0 | ||
| Need some information on Cesaro summability and the Grandi series | Calculus | 0 | ||