Register to reply 
Cesaro summability implies bounded partial sums 
Share this thread: 
#1
Feb613, 02:53 AM

P: 263

1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
Suppose [itex] c_{n} > 0[/itex] for each [itex] n\geq 0.[/itex] Prove that if [itex]\sum ^{\infty}_{n=0} c_{n}[/itex] is Cesaro summable, then the partial sums [itex] S_{N} [/itex] are bounded. 2. Relevant equations  3. The attempt at a solution I tried contraposition; that was getting me nowhere. I have a few inequalities here and there but they don't tell me anything. I need to show that there exists an upperbound for the partial sums. This means there exists a least upperbound. I need to find that least upperbound. Because[itex] c_{n} > 0[/itex] for each [itex] n\geq 0,[/itex] then the series is nondecreasing, which means the partial sums are nondecreasing, so we are looking for an upperbound, not a lowerbound. 


#2
Feb613, 06:34 AM

HW Helper
Thanks
P: 949




Register to reply 
Related Discussions  
Partial Sums resembling sums of secant hyperbolic  Calculus & Beyond Homework  0  
Bounded function implies limit is bounded  Calculus & Beyond Homework  2  
Sequences, Cumulative Sums, Partial Sums Plot  Ti89 Titanium  Calculators  0  
Cesaro summability and Mertens function  Linear & Abstract Algebra  0  
Need some information on Cesaro summability and the Grandi series  Calculus  0 