Proving that \sqrt{p} is irrational

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mandelbroth
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Irrational
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a proposed proof that \(\sqrt{p}\) is irrational for a prime number \(p\). The argument begins with assuming \(\sqrt{p} = \frac{m}{n}\) for coprime integers \(m\) and \(n\), leading to the conclusion that \(n^2\) must equal 1 for \(\frac{m^2}{n^2}\) to remain an integer. This implies \(m^2 = p\), suggesting that \(p\) is a perfect square, which contradicts the nature of prime numbers. Participants agree that the proof is valid and applicable to any positive integer, emphasizing that the square root cannot be a proper rational number. The conclusion is that the proof effectively demonstrates the irrationality of \(\sqrt{p}\).
Mandelbroth
Messages
610
Reaction score
24
I'm aware of the standard proof.

What I'm wondering is why we can't just do the following. Given, I haven't slept well and I'm currently out of caffeine, so this one might be trivial for you guys.

Suppose, by way of contradiction, that ##\sqrt{p}=\frac{m}{n}##, for ##m,n\in\mathbb{Z}## coprime. Then, ##p=\frac{m^2}{n^2}##. Because ##p## is an integer, ##\frac{m^2}{n^2}## must be as well. However, because ##m## and ##n## are coprime, so are ##m^2## and ##n^2##. Thus, ##n^2=1## is necessary for ##\frac{m^2}{n^2}## to be an integer. But that means ##m^2=p##, and ##p## is prime. Thus, a contradiction is met and we see that ##\sqrt{p}## is irrational.

Is this valid? I'll probably figure out my mistake (if I made one) by the time I get back with adequate caffeination, but until then, I'd like to make sure I figure it out.

Thank you.

Edit: Gee, I guess it might be important to mention that ##p## is prime. :facepalm:
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
In my opinion, it's valid.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
It looks OK to me.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Completely valid. The last step basically assumes that a prime cannot be a perfect square, which is true and fairly obvious. But if you really want to make the proof completely obvious, you can state: ##m^2 = p##. Hence ##m|p## (m divides p), which is a contradiction.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Mandelbroth said:
Edit: Gee, I guess it might be important to mention that ##p## is prime. :facepalm:

Actually, it doesn't matter that p is prime. It's valid for any +ve integer: the square root is either an integer or irrational; it cannot be a proper rational.
 
Thank you, all.
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top