How Do Function Transformations Work?

AI Thread Summary
Horizontal translations of functions, such as f(x + c), shift the graph left when c is positive because each x-value must decrease by c to maintain the same output. Stretching and compressing affect the graph's shape; for example, f(ax) compresses the graph horizontally by a factor of A, while Af(x) stretches it vertically by a factor of A. The transformation f(ax) results in a horizontal compression rather than stretching by A, as it effectively reduces the x-values needed to achieve the same output. Graphically comparing f(x) and f(x + C) illustrates that the x-intercept shifts left, confirming the translation effect. Understanding these transformations is crucial for accurately manipulating and interpreting function graphs.
WannabeFeynman
Messages
55
Reaction score
0
Hello all, I need some help to clear my doubts.

Why does a horizontal translation (f(x + c)) move to the left if c is positive?

Can someone graphically explain what effect a stretch and compression (vertical and horizontal) has on the original parent function?

Similar to the first question, why does f(ax) actually stretch by a factor of 1/a instead of a?

Thanks, I might have more questions later.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Is you graph y1=f(x) and y2=f(x+C) and then compare them, whatever "y1" you see at any "x1" will be seen to the left (assuming C>0) at x2="x1-C" for y2 because y2 = f(x2+C) = f(x1-C+C) = f(x1) = y1.
Similarly:
f(Ax) will horizontally thin the graph by a factor of "A" (or stretch it by 1/A)
Af(x) will vertically stretch the graph by a factor of "A".
 
Take a look at this simple example, suppose ##f(x)=x##, a simple straight line through the origin. If ##x=0##, then ##f(x)=0## as well. But if you take ##f(x+a)##, the origin will be at ##-a##. If you draw the line, the origin will move to the left because the origin is now in negative part of the x-axis.
 
Seydlitz said:
Take a look at this simple example, suppose ##f(x)=x##, a simple straight line through the origin. If ##x=0##, then ##f(x)=0## as well. But if you take ##f(x+a)##, the origin will be at ##-a##. If you draw the line, the origin will move to the left because the origin is now in negative part of the x-axis.
The origin doesn't move around, but the x-intercept does.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top