How can I convert 7.8 x 10^-3 to 39/5000 using a calculator?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Loonyplz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fraction
AI Thread Summary
To convert 7.8 x 10^-3 to a fraction, start by recognizing that 10^(-3) equals 1/1000, making 7.8 x 10^-3 equal to 7.8/1000. By multiplying both the numerator and denominator by 10, you obtain 78/10000. Simplifying this fraction by removing common factors leads to the equivalent fraction of 39/5000. The process demonstrates how to use a calculator for such conversions effectively.
Loonyplz
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
how would i convert 7.8 x 10^-3 = 39/5000 / 7.8 x 10^-3 into a fraction on my calculator?

I know the result is 0.0078 but I don't know how to get it, thanks!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
You want to start with 7.8 x 10^-3 and end up with 39/5000 ?

10^(-3) = 1/1000, so 7.8 x 10^-3 = 7.8/1000. Multiply the numerator and the denominator by 10 to get integers and you end up with 78/10000. Remove common factors from this and you get the answer.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top