A model of galactic star formation

AI Thread Summary
A request for a model of galactic star formation, particularly for mature galaxies like the Milky Way, highlights the need for recent academic papers on the subject. The discussion emphasizes the importance of using Google Scholar to find relevant literature, focusing on articles published in reputable journals and those that are widely cited. It also points out that recent papers may be less tested, which could affect their reliability. The need for clarity regarding the requester’s mathematical background is noted, as this will help in identifying suitable models. Overall, the conversation underscores the value of thorough research and understanding the nuances of scientific literature.
manav95
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello, I am looking for a model of galactic star formation that I can study. Particularly, I would like one that works well for mature galaxies like the Milky Way. It also should be relatively recent as well. I am primarily interested in the yearly rate of star formation for galaxies like the Milky Way. Can you all point me towards some papers which can give me a good model of galactic star formation?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Hi. I am NOT familiar enough with the state-of-the-art to give you recommendations. But if no one else answers consider the following.
Your question presents several puzzles: First is why, if you are capable of studying such models, you are unable to find the relevant articles yourself. For that, I have no answer. My best guess is that you have limited mathematical background, and so want simplified (aka dumbed-down) models. If you go to Google Scholar and search on the terms "galactic star formation milky" and limit the search to 2010 or later (even 2012), you will find plenty. I recommend that you pay particular attention to WHERE the paper was published, if you want to avoid some of the "crazies". You want papers published in top-tier journals, of course. I did that search and found thousands. The more a paper is cited, in general, the larger its impact and hence the more important (ie "mainstream") it is. So, rather than simply looking for papers, you want to look for papers (or better, authors) that are widely cited. Unless you just want "a" model, like the one found here:http://iopscience.iop.org/2041-8205/710/1/L11
Second puzzle is your desire for a "recent" paper. In Science, "recent" means "weakly tested" (this is a simplification, but never-the-less...). If it is "recent", the question of how well it works will be THE question that is under discussion. It is unlikely that someone will publish a well accepted, well working model (except to use as a comparison). I apologize if you know all this, and you were just looking for the topic experts to give you their best leads. It would help them if you describe your mathematical sophistication and desired level of involvement: algebra and pencil and paper or numerical PDEs and supercomputer time measured in CPU years?
 
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Asteroid, Data - 1.2% risk of an impact on December 22, 2032. The estimated diameter is 55 m and an impact would likely release an energy of 8 megatons of TNT equivalent, although these numbers have a large uncertainty - it could also be 1 or 100 megatons. Currently the object has level 3 on the Torino scale, the second-highest ever (after Apophis) and only the third object to exceed level 1. Most likely it will miss, and if it hits then most likely it'll hit an ocean and be harmless, but...
Back
Top