Prove pa Using Mathematical Induction

  • Thread starter evil1
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Induction
In summary, the conversation discusses the use of the principle of mathematical induction to prove that the statement pa is true for all integers greater than a certain base value. The base case is n=14, and the inductive step involves proving that pa(k+1) is true by starting with the more complicated side of the inequality and using the inductive hypothesis. The conversation concludes with a question about how to complete the proof.
  • #1
evil1
2
0
In fact pa is true for all integers n greater than a particular base value and you should complete the proof given below to use the principle of mathematical induction to prove this.

pa : n-2 < (n^2 – 3n)/12

Base case is n = 14
Because: n-2 < (n^2 – 3n)/12
14-2 < (196-42)/12
12 < 154/12
12 < 12.83

Inductive step
Inductive Hypothesis : Assume pa(k) is true for some k > 10. Thus k-2 <(k^2 – 3k)/12.

We must prove that pa(k+1) is true i.e. that (k+1)-2 < ((k+1)^2 – 3(k+1))/12

Now to prove such an inequality we always start with the more complicated side:
((k+1)^2 – 3(k+1))/12 = (k^2 + 2k +1 – 3k – 3)/12

= (k^2 – 3k)/12 + (2k-2)/12

> ...?... + (2k-2)/12 ……(b) because

> ..?.... because





This is the question i have been given to do although no idea on how to to finish it any ideas anyone ?

thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?s=&postid=109155#post109155
 
  • #3


To complete the proof, we need to show that (k-2) < (k^2 - 3k)/12 + (2k-2)/12. We can rewrite (b) as (k-2) < (k^2 - 3k + 2k - 2)/12, which simplifies to (k-2) < (k^2 - k - 2)/12.

Next, we can factor the numerator of the right side to get (k-2) < (k-2)(k+1)/12. Since k > 10, we know that k+1 > 11, so we can divide both sides by (k+1) to get (k-2)/(k+1) < (k-2)(k+1)/(12(k+1)).

Finally, we can simplify the right side to get (k-2)/(k+1) < (k-2)/12. Since we assumed that k > 10, we know that (k-2)/12 < 1. Therefore, (k-2)/(k+1) < (k-2)/12 < 1, which proves that pa(k+1) is true.

By the principle of mathematical induction, we can conclude that pa is true for all integers n greater than 10, as desired.
 

What is mathematical induction and how does it relate to proving statements?

Mathematical induction is a method of proof that is used to show that a statement is true for all natural numbers. It is based on the principle that if a statement is true for the first natural number, and can be proven true for any subsequent natural number by using the previous natural number, then the statement is true for all natural numbers.

How do you use mathematical induction to prove a statement?

To use mathematical induction to prove a statement, you first prove that the statement is true for the smallest natural number (usually 0 or 1). This is known as the base case. Then, you assume that the statement is true for some arbitrary natural number, and use this assumption to prove that the statement is also true for the next natural number. This is known as the inductive step. By repeating this process, you can show that the statement is true for all natural numbers.

What is the difference between strong and weak mathematical induction?

Strong mathematical induction and weak mathematical induction are two different forms of mathematical induction. In strong mathematical induction, the inductive step assumes that the statement is true for all natural numbers up to the one being considered. In weak mathematical induction, the inductive step only assumes that the statement is true for the previous natural number. Both forms are equally valid and can be used to prove statements using mathematical induction.

What types of statements can be proven using mathematical induction?

Mathematical induction is commonly used to prove statements about natural numbers, such as equations, inequalities, and divisibility properties. It can also be used to prove statements about other mathematical structures, such as sets, graphs, and trees, as long as they have a well-defined ordering or structure that follows the properties of natural numbers.

What are some common mistakes to avoid when using mathematical induction to prove a statement?

One common mistake when using mathematical induction is assuming that the statement is true for all natural numbers without proving it for the base case. Another mistake is incorrectly applying the inductive step, such as assuming that the statement is true for the next natural number without using the assumption that it is true for the previous one. It is also important to make sure that the inductive step is actually proving the statement for the next natural number, and not just assuming it. Additionally, it is important to be aware of the limitations of mathematical induction and not use it to prove statements that are not related to natural numbers or do not follow the properties of natural numbers.

Similar threads

  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
2
Views
928
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
1
Views
900
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
15
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Precalculus Mathematics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
3
Views
899
Back
Top