Register to reply

Quantum defect for alkalis

by kuecken
Tags: alkalis, defect, quantum, quantum defect
Share this thread:
Jan14-14, 02:19 PM
P: 16
Why does the quantum defect depend only weakly on the principal quantum number n?

The dependence on l is strong. Because this will change the probability distribution of the electron to be closer to the nucleus and thus the shielding of the other electrons a lot.

A change in n, however, will not change the angular wavefunction, it will only change the radial one. Is it because the change in radial wavefunction is not very big between different n? If we change from an s orbital of n=4 to one of n=3, the probability density to be at the nucleus is nonzero in both cases.

Any better ideas would be great.
Thank you
Phys.Org News Partner Physics news on
New complex oxides could advance memory devices
'Squid skin' metamaterials project yields vivid color display
Scientists control surface tension to manipulate liquid metals (w/ Video)
Jan16-14, 07:30 AM
Sci Advisor
PF Gold
DrClaude's Avatar
P: 1,427
Penetration is the principal effect responsible for the quantum defect, as this is what results in an electron experiencing somthing else than a Coulomb-like central potential. The conclusion would then be that penetration is much less dependent on ##n## then on ##l##. This makes sense since ##l > 0## results in an effecitve centrifugal barrier and the electron is kept away from the nucleaus and core electrons.

Register to reply

Related Discussions
Quantum Defect Theory: Looking for an Understandable Explanation Quantum Physics 0
What is a quantum defect? Quantum Physics 4
Rydberg States Exhibiting Quantum Defect? Atomic, Solid State, Comp. Physics 2
How do alkaline rocks get so enriched in alkalis? Earth 2
Etching Glass using Alkalis Chemistry 3