- #1
Reclamist
- 4
- 0
Hello,
I have just started to read Stephen Hawking's The Illustrated A Brief History Of Time, and I'm finding it very stimulating. It's stirring up questions in my mind.. I note that Edwin Hubble has observed, and that it is apparently common knowledge now among physicists, that all observable galaxies appear to be moving away from one another. This seems to indicate both that the universe is expanding, and that matter once did occupy a common point (of stated "infinite" density).
I recall a particular model which describes this situation well: A point, representing the galaxy that you and I reside within, is drawn onto a balloon along with many other points, which each represent other galaxies and objects in the universe. Imagine that the balloon were being inflated. Upon inflation, all points drawn onto the balloon's surface would appear to be moving away from one another. Thus, we would appear to have a model of the expanding universe. (I wonder if there are problems with this model?)
My questions are as follows: If it is observed that all(?) large-scale objects (such as galaxies) appear to be moving away from each other, as per the above model, could one potentially extrapolate the point from which all matter is moving away from, as if one were deflating the balloon? Thus, could one discover the approximate "centre" of our apparently infinite universe? Some follow-up questions would be: Supposing that this point did exist, would it be of any relevance or significance? Would there be any matter near this point at all, or would all matter have long-since moved away from it? Alternatively, from it, would matter be constantly spewing forth like a geyser? In occupying this point, would one witness all matter in the universe moving away from oneself more uniformly than what one observes from our present stand-point (which is, I think, the witnessing of neighbouring galaxies moving away in an "angular" fashion from a common point)?
Thank you.
I have just started to read Stephen Hawking's The Illustrated A Brief History Of Time, and I'm finding it very stimulating. It's stirring up questions in my mind.. I note that Edwin Hubble has observed, and that it is apparently common knowledge now among physicists, that all observable galaxies appear to be moving away from one another. This seems to indicate both that the universe is expanding, and that matter once did occupy a common point (of stated "infinite" density).
I recall a particular model which describes this situation well: A point, representing the galaxy that you and I reside within, is drawn onto a balloon along with many other points, which each represent other galaxies and objects in the universe. Imagine that the balloon were being inflated. Upon inflation, all points drawn onto the balloon's surface would appear to be moving away from one another. Thus, we would appear to have a model of the expanding universe. (I wonder if there are problems with this model?)
My questions are as follows: If it is observed that all(?) large-scale objects (such as galaxies) appear to be moving away from each other, as per the above model, could one potentially extrapolate the point from which all matter is moving away from, as if one were deflating the balloon? Thus, could one discover the approximate "centre" of our apparently infinite universe? Some follow-up questions would be: Supposing that this point did exist, would it be of any relevance or significance? Would there be any matter near this point at all, or would all matter have long-since moved away from it? Alternatively, from it, would matter be constantly spewing forth like a geyser? In occupying this point, would one witness all matter in the universe moving away from oneself more uniformly than what one observes from our present stand-point (which is, I think, the witnessing of neighbouring galaxies moving away in an "angular" fashion from a common point)?
Thank you.