Is always a Lagrangian L=T-V ?

  • Thread starter Karlisbad
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Lagrangian
In summary, the conversation discusses the equations for Hamiltonian and Lagrangian in different scenarios, including classical and relativistic cases. It also raises the question of whether there is always a way to separate the Lagrangian into kinetic and potential terms. However, it is noted that the Hamiltonian may not always equal the energy, as seen in the case of a charged particle in a magnetic field.
  • #1
Karlisbad
131
0
That's my question..although in more general cases [tex] L=T-V [/tex]

[tex] H=T+V [/tex] however there're several important exceptions..for example:

a) Classically (Non relativisitc) the Gravitational "Energy" (=Hamiltonian for a time-independent Potential) is:

[tex] H=(1/2)\int_{V}\rho (\gra \phi)^{2} [/tex]

b) Einstein-HIlbert Lagrangian [tex] L=\sqrt (-g) R [/tex] -g is the

determinant of the metric and R is Ricci scalar.

Is there always a kind of "transform" so you can always split te Lagrangian into a Kinetic and a potential terms...:confused: :confused:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
First of all, it is not sufficient that the hamiltonian have a time-independent potential for it to equal the energy. That's only for the hamiltonian to be conserved in time (actually, it's that [tex]dH/dt = \partial_t L[/tex] that you need). Also, you might want to look up the situation of a charged particle in the magnetic field. the lagrangian is decidedly NOT T - V, but the hamiltonian does equal thte energy of the charged particle (does not include the energy of the field).
 
  • #3


The short answer is no, it is not always true that the Lagrangian is equal to T-V. While this is a common expression in classical mechanics, there are exceptions to this rule, such as in the cases mentioned in the question.

In general, the Lagrangian is a function that describes the dynamics of a system and can take different forms depending on the specific system and its interactions. In classical mechanics, the Lagrangian is typically written as T-V, where T represents the kinetic energy and V represents the potential energy. However, in other fields such as general relativity, the Lagrangian can take on a different form and may not necessarily be split into T and V terms.

In the examples provided, the Lagrangian for gravitational energy and the Einstein-Hilbert Lagrangian do not follow the T-V form. This is because they represent different physical systems and interactions. In the case of gravitational energy, the Lagrangian is written in terms of the gravitational potential and its derivative, while in general relativity, the Lagrangian is written in terms of the metric and its curvature.

So while it may be possible to transform the Lagrangian into a T-V form in some cases, it is not always the case and is not a general rule. The form of the Lagrangian depends on the specific system and its interactions, and cannot always be written as T-V.
 

1. Is a Lagrangian always equal to T-V?

No, a Lagrangian can take on many different forms and may not always be equal to the difference between kinetic and potential energy. It depends on the specific system being studied.

2. What is the significance of the Lagrangian in physics?

The Lagrangian is a mathematical function that plays a crucial role in the study of dynamics and motion in physics. It allows for the derivation of the equations of motion and helps to simplify complex systems.

3. Can the Lagrangian be used in any type of system?

Yes, the Lagrangian can be applied to a wide range of physical systems, from simple mechanical systems to more complex systems in quantum mechanics and field theory.

4. How is the Lagrangian different from the Hamiltonian?

The Lagrangian and Hamiltonian are both mathematical functions used to describe the dynamics of a system. However, the Lagrangian is based on kinetic and potential energies, while the Hamiltonian incorporates both energy and momentum.

5. Are there any limitations to using a Lagrangian?

While the Lagrangian is a useful tool in physics, it may not always be the most efficient approach for solving problems. In certain cases, other methods such as the Hamiltonian or Newton's laws may be more appropriate.

Similar threads

Replies
30
Views
2K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
0
Views
661
Replies
30
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
576
  • Classical Physics
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
27
Views
2K
  • Classical Physics
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
630
Replies
2
Views
762
Replies
2
Views
850
Back
Top