A question about CP Violation.

In summary, the standard model predicts that there should be more matter than antimatter in the universe, but not the dominant proportion that is observed. This is due to certain reactions, such as weak decays, occurring at different rates for matter and antimatter. However, this alone does not fully explain the matter-antimatter imbalance. The disparity may also be attributed to the fact that certain reactions produce matter at a higher rate than antimatter, or that there are weak decays and anti-weak decays.
  • #1
damian081
3
0
Am I correct in my understanding that the standard model predicts that there should be more matter than antimatter in the universe, but not the dominant proportion that is observed? Is that the basic problem?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #3
Thank you very much for your answer and welcome.
Does the standard model predict this disparity because the interactions of the strong force are more statistically likely than those of the weak force?
 
  • #4
Don't understand the question - which predicted disparity?
Did you read the link?
 
  • #5
damian081 said:
Am I correct in my understanding that the standard model predicts that there should be more matter than antimatter in the universe, but not the dominant proportion that is observed? Is that the basic problem?
Yes.

damian081 said:
Does the standard model predict this disparity because the interactions of the strong force are more statistically likely than those of the weak force?
No, at least one reason for the matter-antimatter imbalance is that certain reactions (weak decays) go at different rates than their anti- versions. As you said, the known instances of this are not sufficient in themselves to explain the large matter-antimatter imbalance.
 
  • #6
Bill_K said:
Yes.


No, at least one reason for the matter-antimatter imbalance is that certain reactions (weak decays) go at different rates than their anti- versions. As you said, the known instances of this are not sufficient in themselves to explain the large matter-antimatter imbalance.

Is that to say then that weak decays produce matter at a higher rate than anti matter or that there are weak decays and anti-weak decays?
 

1. What is CP violation?

CP violation is a phenomenon in particle physics where the combined symmetry of charge conjugation (C) and parity (P) is violated. This means that certain processes in particle interactions behave differently when time is reversed, violating the fundamental symmetry of physics.

2. How was CP violation discovered?

CP violation was first observed in 1964 by James Cronin and Val Fitch in experiments involving the decay of neutral kaons. They found that the decay rates of neutral kaons and their antiparticles were not equal, indicating a violation of CP symmetry.

3. What is the significance of CP violation?

CP violation is important because it helps to explain the matter-antimatter asymmetry observed in our universe. According to the Big Bang theory, equal amounts of matter and antimatter should have been created in the early universe, but this is not the case. CP violation provides a possible explanation for this imbalance.

4. How is CP violation measured?

CP violation is measured by studying the decay of particles and looking for differences in the decay rates of particles and their antiparticles. This can be done using high-energy particle colliders, such as the Large Hadron Collider, or through precision measurements of particle decays in experiments such as the Belle II experiment.

5. Can CP violation be explained by the Standard Model?

Yes, CP violation is included in the Standard Model of particle physics, which is the currently accepted theory that describes the fundamental particles and their interactions. However, the amount of CP violation predicted by the Standard Model is not enough to explain the observed matter-antimatter asymmetry, so further research is still being done to understand this phenomenon.

Similar threads

  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
20
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
816
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
23
Views
4K
Replies
12
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
0
Views
626
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
1
Views
934
Back
Top