Revisiting Dark Matter Estimates in Axially Symmetric Galaxies

In summary, the authors H. Balasin and D. Grumiller have studied exact stationary axially symmetric solutions of the 4D Einstein equations with co-rotating pressureless perfect fluid sources. This has implications for the dynamics of galaxies and the dark matter phenomenon. They have found a particular solution with an approximately flat rotation curve and have observed that simple Newtonian arguments overestimate the amount of matter needed to explain these curves by more than 30%. This result is more plausible than previous studies and suggests that GR effects can account for a small but significant portion of the dark matter. However, there are still questions about how well this approach would work on a larger scale.
  • #1
wolram
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
4,446
558
http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0602519

Authors: H. Balasin, D. Grumiller
Comments: 11 pages revtex4, 4 eps figures
Report-no: LU-ITP 2006/002

Exact stationary axially symmetric solutions of the 4D Einstein equations with co-rotating pressureless perfect fluid sources are studied. This is of physical relevance for the dynamics of galaxies and questions concerning dark matter. A particular solution with approximately flat rotation curve is discussed in some detail. We find that simple Newtonian arguments over-estimate the amount of matter needed to explain these curves by more than 30%.
 
Space news on Phys.org
  • #2
That's very interesting. Basically, they've done an analysis similar to that of Cooperstock and Tieu (the "GR accounting for dark matter" folks), but avoiding all of the "exotic matter" and "singular disk" problems. They find that GR effects can account for a small (~30 percent), but non-negligible, fraction of the dark matter. I must admit, it's still surprising to me that GR would be necessary at all in this limit, but I find this result to be much more plausible than the Cooperstock one.
 
  • #3
Agreed, ST. It is a plausible approach. However, I question how well it would work with large scale structures.
 

What is dark matter?

Dark matter is a type of matter that does not emit or interact with electromagnetic radiation, making it invisible to traditional methods of detection. Its existence is inferred through its gravitational effects on visible matter.

What is an overestimate of dark matter?

An overestimate of dark matter refers to the possibility that scientists may have overestimated the amount of dark matter in the universe. This can happen due to limitations in current detection methods and the complexity of understanding the behavior of dark matter.

Why is it important to accurately estimate dark matter?

Accurately estimating dark matter is important because it is believed to make up about 85% of the total matter in the universe. Understanding the true amount and distribution of dark matter is crucial in our understanding of the formation and evolution of the universe.

What are some potential consequences of an overestimate of dark matter?

An overestimate of dark matter could lead to incorrect theories and models about the behavior of the universe. This could also affect our understanding of the distribution of galaxies and the formation of structures in the universe.

How do scientists attempt to estimate dark matter?

Scientists use various methods to estimate dark matter, such as studying the rotation curves of galaxies, gravitational lensing, and analyzing the distribution of visible matter in the universe. However, these methods have limitations and uncertainties, which can contribute to an overestimate of dark matter.

Similar threads

  • Cosmology
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • Cosmology
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
37
Views
7K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
12
Views
212
  • Beyond the Standard Models
8
Replies
264
Views
15K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • Cosmology
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
72
Views
5K
Back
Top