- #1
Clapstyx
- 2
- 0
Hi there,
I was wondering if you might be able to offer some proof or disproof on a theory for a new engine design that I am working on.
We all know that steam as it condensates in a closed vessel creates a vacuum, so I am designing an engine which is designed to harness this natural energy as its first priority capturing the power created as a substance seeks to revert to its most natural state of rest.
The basic design that I am thinking about is as follows.
Sealed piston chamber with a small amount of liquid which becomes volatile in the presence of light moving from liquid to gas (eg one of the many petrochemical byproducts).
The transition to gas triggered by a light as a kind of "firing" mechanism forcing the piston from the down position to the up position as the liquid expands to a gas state (is room temperature possible ?)
With the removal of the light source the gas reverts to a liquid creating a vacuum in the chamber and "pulling" the piston back to the down position (are the up and down forces equal ?)
My aim is to design an engine which not only converts electromagnetic energy to chemical energy to motive energy but also create a situation where there are no emissions and the only ongoing "fuel" is light itself.
From my research I have found that there are some volatile light sensitive chemicals which require little "light charge" to enact the transition.
The primary questions I have are as follows :
1. Will the vacuum be created at the same rate as the original expansion when the light is off.
2. Will the chemical breakdown after repeated transitions ? Are there any known ones that don't ?
3. Is the vacuum force equal to the expansion force as logic suggests or will it retain some degree of electromagnetic charge.
The engine design is being included as part of a movie to raise money to preserve the worlds oldest rainforest which needs an income stream to be created in order to be shielded from encroaching residential development.
If you are able to shed some light on whether this design contravenes any of the laws of thermodynamics it will be of great assistance.
I am not a physicist myself just a guy looking to solve the problem of greenhouse emissions.
Thanks for any knowledge you are interested in sharing
Clapstyx
I was wondering if you might be able to offer some proof or disproof on a theory for a new engine design that I am working on.
We all know that steam as it condensates in a closed vessel creates a vacuum, so I am designing an engine which is designed to harness this natural energy as its first priority capturing the power created as a substance seeks to revert to its most natural state of rest.
The basic design that I am thinking about is as follows.
Sealed piston chamber with a small amount of liquid which becomes volatile in the presence of light moving from liquid to gas (eg one of the many petrochemical byproducts).
The transition to gas triggered by a light as a kind of "firing" mechanism forcing the piston from the down position to the up position as the liquid expands to a gas state (is room temperature possible ?)
With the removal of the light source the gas reverts to a liquid creating a vacuum in the chamber and "pulling" the piston back to the down position (are the up and down forces equal ?)
My aim is to design an engine which not only converts electromagnetic energy to chemical energy to motive energy but also create a situation where there are no emissions and the only ongoing "fuel" is light itself.
From my research I have found that there are some volatile light sensitive chemicals which require little "light charge" to enact the transition.
The primary questions I have are as follows :
1. Will the vacuum be created at the same rate as the original expansion when the light is off.
2. Will the chemical breakdown after repeated transitions ? Are there any known ones that don't ?
3. Is the vacuum force equal to the expansion force as logic suggests or will it retain some degree of electromagnetic charge.
The engine design is being included as part of a movie to raise money to preserve the worlds oldest rainforest which needs an income stream to be created in order to be shielded from encroaching residential development.
If you are able to shed some light on whether this design contravenes any of the laws of thermodynamics it will be of great assistance.
I am not a physicist myself just a guy looking to solve the problem of greenhouse emissions.
Thanks for any knowledge you are interested in sharing
Clapstyx