Register to reply 
Is it intuitive that the Energy levels... 
Share this thread: 
#1
Apr2806, 02:18 AM

P: 2,267

For a 1D infinite well, The energy levels of an electron trapped inside is dependent on the length of the well. The longer the length, the less its energy will be for each state.
I am aware how the formula is derived. The main form of the formula is a solution of Schrodinger's equation which books say is not derived from anything more fundalmental. But is the fact that the energy levels are depedent on L intuitive? If so why? Could you say that a longer well would mean that the energy of the electron is distributed more evenly for each position x in the well? Hence the energy of the electron is lower at each x in the well for a particular state in a longer well? 


#2
Apr2806, 08:18 AM

Sci Advisor
HW Helper
P: 1,204

Well you know that the physicists always say that to probe smaller distances requires higher energy particles.
Carl 


#3
Apr2806, 09:21 AM

Emeritus
Sci Advisor
PF Gold
P: 11,155

Depends on your intuition. If you are stuck with a classical intuition, it will not help you any.
Here's one kind of intuition : The smaller the box, the greater the momentum uncertainty... 


#4
Apr2806, 11:25 AM

P: 2

Is it intuitive that the Energy levels...
yeah right.
only if your " box " happens to be an atom  in which case  what are you putting in it again? if not, any basic QM text will tell you that for the same potential you could choose position or momentum eigenstates (or eigenstates of any other operator) which would have, respectively, 0 uncertainty in position and momentum. (moral: math works even if intuition runs awry) 


#5
Apr2806, 12:42 PM

P: 227




#6
Apr2806, 01:14 PM

Sci Advisor
HW Helper
P: 3,025




#7
Apr2806, 11:17 PM

P: 2,267

So the reason why E is depedent on L is because of UP.
When I said intuitive, I meant classically intuitive. Obviously, since the UC is needed, the answer is that it is not intuitive. Classically, wouldn't it be the case that the energy of an electron is fixed from the start, no matter what the size of the well it is in? Hence intuitively E should not depedent on L. E=E until the electron is given potential or kinetic energy via a force. Looks like my explanation... 'Could you say that a longer well would mean that the energy of the electron is distributed more evenly for each position x in the well? Hence the energy of the electron is lower at each x in the well for a particular state in a longer well?' is wrong in the classic sense. Is it wrong in a QM sense as well? 


Register to reply 
Related Discussions  
Quantum energy levels  Quantum Physics  6  
Energy levels  Introductory Physics Homework  2  
Kinetic Energy and Radiant Energy levels  Atomic, Solid State, Comp. Physics  0  
Energy Levels  Introductory Physics Homework  1  
Energy levels  Introductory Physics Homework  16 