REU letter: comments? criticisms?

  • Thread starter Thread starter vincebs
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Reu
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a student's request for feedback on their REU letter intended for a Canadian university's undergraduate research award program. The letter outlines their academic background in physics, specifically their interests in experimental particle physics and condensed matter, as well as their relevant research experiences. Initial feedback suggests the letter lacks a personal touch and reads more like a list of interests rather than a narrative that conveys genuine passion. Critics recommend that the student elaborate on why these topics are personally significant and how their past experiences have shaped their understanding and skills. Additionally, it is advised to avoid phrases like "if you are looking" and instead assert how they fit into the research program, emphasizing their qualifications and enthusiasm for contributing to the field. A revised version of the letter incorporates some of this feedback, adding personal reflections and detailing specific research experiences to enhance the narrative.
vincebs
Messages
147
Reaction score
0
My REU letter: comments? criticisms?

Hey everyone,

I wrote the following REU letter, it's for a Canadian university. (NSERC is kind of like the Canadian equivalent of the National Science Foundation). I'd greatly appreciate it if you all could evaluate it. Any things I should add or take out? Anything that should be rephrased? Is the length alright? It kind of feels short to me at the moment...

---

I'm a student in the Physics Specialist Program at the University of Toronto. My career intention is to pursue graduate study in physics. The two fields that I am seriously considering to pursue are experimental particle physics and experimental condensed matter. This is a direction I have taken myself toward, as my interest in physics is in quantum mechanics and interactions at the atomic and subatomic levels. For this reason, I am particularly interested in matter in the presence of high-energy radiation and magnetic fields. Related to this, I am attracted to research into high Tc superconductivity as well as cooling and trapping techniques for cold atoms. In the high energy area, what interest me are neutrino oscillations and the interaction of particles with the Higgs field. I intend that by participating in the NSERC USRA program, I will gain further practical experience in the use of modern experimental apparatuses in physics that I first became acquainted with in my 3rd-year experimental physics laboratory course.

If you are looking for a student with previous physics research experience, I am currently working with a professor to design an optical imaging system using CODE V software for his cold atoms apparatus. I was a research assistant this summer responsible for performing IR/Raman frequency calculations with GAUSSIAN software on large carbon-based molecules. In 2005, I was a member of a group researching Bose-Einstein Condensate as part of my second-year physics laboratory course.

---

Thanks a lot,
Vince
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
By the way, USRA = undergraduate student research award

Could someone give me their thoughts on this?
 
my 2 cents:
1. perhaps you can tell more about why things are interesting to you? the statement doesn't seem personal to me... it seems like a list of things someone might be interested in. perhaps make it more personal? maybe state some specific work that you do in previous research experience and how they enhance your knowledge?

2. i don't think it's a good idea to say "if you are looking". You should address how you fit into their research program, and how you are what they are looking for.
 
thanks for the advice tim_lou, i'll keep these two things in mind
 
Can anyone else provide some input to this letter?

Here is a revised versioN:

I am a student in the Physics Specialist Program at the University of Toronto. My career intention is to pursue graduate study in physics and join the physics research community. The two fields that I am seriously considering to pursue are experimental particle physics and experimental condensed matter. This is a direction I have taken myself toward, as my interest in physics is in quantum mechanics and interactions at the atomic and subatomic levels. Personally, I’ve been interested in these phenomena since having read books about the very small when I was younger, which inspired me to learn more about what is different in the submicroscopic world. For this reason, I am particularly interested in matter in the presence of high-energy radiation and magnetic fields. Related to this, I am attracted to research into high Tc superconductivity as well as cooling and trapping techniques for cold atoms. In the high energy area, what interest me are neutrino oscillations and the interaction of particles with the Higgs field. I intend that by participating in the NSERC USRA program, I will gain further practical experience in the use of modern experimental apparatuses in physics that I first became acquainted with in my 3rd-year experimental physics laboratory course.

In terms of previous physics research experience, I am currently working with a professor to design an optical imaging system using CODE V software for his cold atoms apparatus. From this I was able to obtain an understanding of the design of multiple-element optical systems and the diagnostic criteria used to evaluate them. I was a research assistant this summer responsible for performing IR/Raman frequency calculations with GAUSSIAN software on large carbon-based molecules. This experience led me to understand the concepts behind density functional theory (DFT) calculations for combining atomic orbitals, as well as Raman and IR spectra. In 2005, I was a member of a group researching Bose-Einstein Condensate as part of my second-year physics laboratory course which familiarized me with cooling and trapping techniques in cold atom experiments.
 
Last edited:
I'm going to make this one quick since I have little time. Background: Throughout my life I have always done good in Math. I almost always received 90%+, and received easily upwards of 95% when I took normal-level HS Math courses. When I took Grade 9 "De-Streamed" Math (All students must take "De-Streamed" in Canada), I initially had 98% until I got very sick and my mark had dropped to 95%. The Physics teachers and Math teachers talked about me as if I were some sort of genius. Then, an...
Bit Britain-specific but I was wondering, what's the best path to take for A-Levels out of the following (I know Y10 seems a bit early to be thinking about A-levels, but my choice will impact what I do this year/ in y11) I (almost) definitely want to do physics at University - so keep that in mind... The subjects that I'm almost definitely going to take are Maths, Further Maths and Physics, and I'm taking a fast track programme which means that I'll be taking AS computer science at the end...
After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools. I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study. I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests. But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc). For your information, I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia - one SCI...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
101
Replies
14
Views
2K
Back
Top