J j thomson's previous experiment

  • Thread starter Thread starter gnome
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Experiment
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

J.J. Thomson's earlier experiment, as discussed in Tipler's "Modern Physics" (3rd ed.), involved measuring the velocity of charged particles using total charge and temperature change upon striking an insulated collector. The derived equation, e/m = 2W/(B²R²Q), indicates that the measurements from this experiment were more accurate than those from his later, more famous method. The discussion highlights the relationship between the equations governing charged particles in a magnetic field and the derivation of Thomson's results.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electromagnetic theory, specifically the behavior of charged particles in magnetic fields.
  • Familiarity with the concepts of charge (e), mass (m), and energy (W) in physics.
  • Knowledge of basic algebra and manipulation of equations.
  • Access to Tipler's "Modern Physics" (3rd ed.) for reference.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of Thomson's equation e/m = 2W/(B²R²Q) in detail.
  • Learn about the principles of charged particle motion in magnetic fields.
  • Explore the historical context and significance of Thomson's experiments in the field of physics.
  • Investigate advanced topics in electromagnetic theory, such as Lorentz force and its applications.
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, educators teaching electromagnetic theory, and researchers interested in the historical experiments of J.J. Thomson and their implications in modern physics.

gnome
Messages
1,031
Reaction score
1
j j thomson's "previous" experiment

I thought I was going to like this book, but it's defying me.

I'm staring at pg 123 of Tipler's Modern Physics text (3rd ed.) This is talking about an experiment he says Thomson did before the "famous" J J Thomson experiment. It goes like this:

In his first measurement, Thomson determined the velocity from measurements of the total charge and the temperature change occurring when the beam struck an insulated collector. For N particles, the total charge is Q = Ne, while the temperature rise is proportional to the energy loss W = N(½mu2). Eliminating N and u from these equations, we obtain

[tex]\frac{e}{m} = \frac{2W}{B^2R^2Q}\hspace{200}eq.\hspace{5} 3-3[/tex]
That's all he says about that experiment, except for a brief note later on that the measurements obtained from that one were actually more accurate than the measurements he obtained from the later, and more well-known, method.

Anyway, on the preceding page, he talks a bit about the circular path followed by charged particles in a magnetic field and gives

[tex]quB = \frac{mu^2}{R}[/tex]

Obvious enough. (Here, little q is of course the charge on an individual particle, so it corresponds to e, not Q, in the other equations.)

But I don't see how that helps in getting to equation 3-3 above. All I get from the two preliminary equations is
[tex]\frac{e}{m} = \frac{Qu^2}{2W}[/tex]
To get from that to his equation 3-3 I have to say
[tex]u^2 = \frac{4W^2}{B^2R^2Q^2}[/tex]
and I don't see anything that let's me say that.

Any ideas?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not familiar with Thomson's "previous" experiment, but if you look at the two equations:

[tex]quB = \frac{mu^2}{R}[/tex]
and
[tex]\frac{e}{m} = \frac{Qu^2}{2W}[/tex]

If you solve for u in the first equation you get

[tex]u = \frac{eBR}{m}[/tex]

which you can then substitute into the second equation to get the desired equation.

cookiemonster
 
Hmmm...I hate to admit to how long I didn't see that.

Thanks for providing the requisite smack in the head.
 

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
922
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K