Register to reply 
Friction between two surfaces 
Share this thread: 
#1
May1307, 08:02 AM

P: 16

1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
hi, i am almost done my lab on the coefficient of friction on an inclined plane. I was attempting to prove that the coefficent of static friction would be the same no matter the weight of the mass that was static on the incline. However, i plotted a coefficient versus mass graph, and the line wasn't horizontal (the coefficient changed). My quick question was whether i still need to find the equation for finding the coefficient based on my results, or if i could just conclude that in my case, the coefficient didn't stay constant, and then move to my conclusion 2. Relevant equations 3. The attempt at a solution 


#2
May1307, 08:07 AM

Emeritus
Sci Advisor
PF Gold
P: 9,781

How did you calculate the coefficient of friction for your results?



#3
May1307, 08:26 AM

P: 16

i had an incline, measured the weight of the mass, and changed the angle such that if i increased the angle by a little bit, the mass would slide. I did this for several different masses and recorded the angle. I then used a freebody diagram and the equation for static friciton (u = Fmax/R)



#4
May1307, 08:28 AM

Emeritus
Sci Advisor
PF Gold
P: 9,781

Friction between two surfaces
And how did you calculate the normal reaction force?



#5
May1307, 08:34 AM

P: 16

R = mg cosx
F = mg sinx so in essence, the coefficient was tanx 


#6
May1307, 08:39 AM

P: 16

technically, all i need to know is whether i would have to process the graph to find a relation between weight and the coefficient (although i know that technicallly the coefficient is independant of mass) if all i wanted to prove in the lab was that the coefficient was independant of mass (and in my case, my experimental data didn't prove it)



#7
May1307, 09:03 AM

Emeritus
Sci Advisor
PF Gold
P: 9,781

Your not actually plotting [itex]\mu[/itex] vs. [itex]m[/itex] what your actually plotting is [itex]\tan\theta[/itex] vs. m since;
[tex]\mu = \frac{F}{R} = \frac{mg\sin\theta}{mg\cos\theta} = \tan\theta[/tex] 


#8
May1307, 11:16 AM

P: 16

but since tanx = u, so why should it matter whether you plot u vs. m or tanx vs m?



#9
May1307, 11:20 AM

Emeritus
Sci Advisor
PF Gold
P: 9,781




#10
May1307, 11:25 AM

P: 16

no, because the greater mass wouldn't stay static at the certain angle, so it would decrease.
if i am trying to prove that the coefficient should stay the same, and it doesn't in my experiment, do i have to do more, or can i just stop once the graph shows that the coefficient changed? 


#11
May1307, 05:03 PM

P: 4

i thought that: Frict max=mu R
so for your experiments to prove mu is irrespective of mass the particle has to be on the point of slipping that may be too simple i am only doing as physics and you guys might be talking about something higher tho from mechanics mu is >= to R/Frict max (sorry about symbols ect) 


#12
May1307, 07:38 PM

P: 16

honestly, the only question i wanted answered was in respect to the set up to the lab. Once you process enough data to prove/disprove the purpose of the lab, do you have to do any more processing, or can you just go straight to conclusion/evaluation?



Register to reply 
Related Discussions  
Rotating 2D coordinate geometry/conic sections into 3D  how?  General Math  7  
Intersection between surfaces  Calculus & Beyond Homework  2  
Smoothness of surfaces  Calculus  5  
Smoothness of surfaces  Calculus  0  
Nodal surfaces?  Chemistry  5 