Nutational damping in satellites

  • Thread starter Thread starter vishal007win
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Damping Satellites
AI Thread Summary
Modeling fuel sloshing in satellite fuel tanks can be approached using a hybrid mass-spring-pendulum model that incorporates energy dissipation. While NASA has explored similar models, incorporating passive anti-slosh devices like mesh fillers can help attenuate slosh but won't eliminate it entirely. Designers must ensure that both passive and active slosh control methods are effective to maintain vehicle stability. The discussion also touches on the benefits of using non-dimensional equations for damping ratios, questioning whether to use the total mass of the body or just the mass of the fuel. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for successful spacecraft design and operation.
vishal007win
Messages
76
Reaction score
0
i want to ask ...how can i model sloshing of fuel in satellite feul tank , to an energy sink model...
can anybody help me?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
in one of the experiment NASA has done, they have modeled this to pendulum model...but i want to incorporate energy dissipation to it too
 
Wouldn't it be easier to use a slosh-free tank design, such as a mesh filler?
 
Danger said:
Wouldn't it be easier to use a slosh-free tank design, such as a mesh filler?
A mesh doesn't stop slosh, but it can help attenuate it -- in the right circumstances.

Spacecraft designers do use meshes (isogrids) as one of several passive anti-slosh devices. See http://books.google.com/patents/about?id=cUoHAAAAEBAJ".

Unless the fuel tank is packed jam full with passive anti-slosh devices, there will always be slosh of some sort. Since slosh has resulted in multiple vehicle incidents, it is a very good idea to confirm via analysis and simulation that the passive anti-slosh devices and active slosh controls will work to keep the vehicle under control.

Everything you want to know about slosh: http://sloshcentral.bbbeard.org/.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thanks, DH. That was very informative. I never realized how complex the matter is.
 
thanks DH..
i was looking for this only...
but one more thing to ask..
i m working with non-dimensionalzd equations
so wud it be more beneficial to work with damping ratio ς = c/2mω0. where m is the total mass of body...
or damping ratio ς = c/2mω0. where m is the mass of fuel...
hope u r getting what i m tryin to ask...
 
Back
Top