Prove Graph is Function: Logic & Alternatives

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mentallic
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function Proof
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on alternative methods for proving that a graph represents a function beyond the horizontal line test. Logic is suggested as a useful tool for this proof, particularly when determining if an equation of the form f(x,y) = 0 can express y as a function of x. Examples illustrate that certain equations, like x² + y² = 1, do not yield a function due to multiple y-values for a single x. In contrast, equations such as 2y - x - 1 = 0 demonstrate that a unique y-value corresponds to each x, confirming it as a function. The conversation also touches on the importance of considering the domain of the function when establishing its validity.
Mentallic
Homework Helper
Messages
3,802
Reaction score
95
I'm interested in getting a better answer to showing/proving a graph is a function than the usual "horizontal line test" response. Is the use of logic the best tool for proving a function? Because that line test method is basically that.
Also, translating the function by illustrating it on the x-y plane isn't always so simple without a calculator, so other methods may be necessary.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Depends on what you want to do. Are you trying to show a graph is representative of a function (in which case you don't need to worry about trying to draw it) or are you trying to show that an equation of the form f(x,y) = 0 i.e. an equation with x's and y's can be written so that y is a function of x?
 
I'm trying to show the second that you mentioned :smile:

Office_Shredder said:
or are you trying to show that an equation of the form f(x,y) = 0 i.e. an equation with x's and y's can be written so that y is a function of x?
 
What you really need to show is:

Given a value of x, there is only one possible value of y(x). Example for each:

x2 + y2 = 1

If x = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} then y can be plus or minus \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} so this does not give a function (and drawing the circle we see this is obvious). More generally, if y2 = 1-x2 and w2 = 1-x2 for the same value of x, then y2 = w2 so y= +/- w and in general y and w do not have to be equal

If on the other hand we have 2y-x-1 = 0 Then if 2y-x-1 = 0 and 2w-x-1 = 0 for a set value of x, then 2y=x+1=2w and we can see y=w is necessary. Hence for each value of x there is only a single value of y that satisfies this, and y can be defined as a function of x.

There's also another possible concern about the domain. y is a function of x over the real numbers by definition also means for each x, there exists a possible value of y. If your possible function was y = \sqrt{1-x^2} (taking only positive values of square root) unlike in the circle case this satisfies the condition for each x there is at most one value of y. But by definition, this is not a function over the real numbers because outside of the interval [-1,1] y is not defined. Instead it's only a function over that interval. Generally this isn't the condition you're worried about though (since what the domain of the function is probably isn't the question at hand)
 
So it is necessary to make the y variable of an equation f(x,y) the subject so as to know if it is the form y^2=y(x) or maybe other operative functions that result in more than one value such as sin(y)=y(x) or others that exist (which I wouldn't know about).
Is it possible to show the equation is a function or not without re-arranging the equation? Possibly because re-arrangement would be too difficult or impossible with elementary functions.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top