Research: Applied vs. Fundamental

AI Thread Summary
Graduating with a B.S. in physics and transitioning to a Ph.D. program in nanoscale science raises questions about future research opportunities, particularly in fundamental areas like particle physics. Concerns revolve around whether a specialization in applied physics will limit access to postdoctoral positions in more theoretical fields. While some believe that a shortage of candidates in particle physics could open doors, others emphasize that the focus on nanoscale science signifies a commitment to that field. The discussion highlights the strong job prospects for nanoscientists in academia, suggesting that once tenure is achieved, researchers may have the freedom to explore diverse topics. Ultimately, the choice of specialization may restrict future experimentation with different fields.
DanielFaraday
Messages
86
Reaction score
0
I'm graduating with a B.S. in physics and I will soon be starting a Ph.D. program in nanoscale science, which is essentially an applied physics program. I chose this program because my undergraduate research was focused in this area and I've really enjoyed it.

However, I'm wondering if my choice of Ph.D. program will limit my future opportunities to applied research only. There are some topics that I would love to research, such as particle physics, which are quite fundamental. Would I be able to get a post doc position in particle physics with a Ph.D. in nanoscale science, or would these positions only be offered to students that specifically researched particle physics as graduate students? At what point should you stop experimenting with different fields?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If there is a shortage of particle physics PhD students then you might have a chance. But that's like saying if there is shortage of water in the UK then France might make some money exporting it. On the brighter side, the faculty job prospects are good for nanoscientists. And once you have tenure you can research what you want...

Reality check - you *have* stopped experimenting with different fields. You are now a nanoscientist.
 
After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools. I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study. I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests. But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc). For your information, I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia - one SCI...
Hello, I’m an undergraduate student pursuing degrees in both computer science and physics. I was wondering if anyone here has graduated with these degrees and applied to a physics graduate program. I’m curious about how graduate programs evaluated your applications. In addition, if I’m interested in doing research in quantum fields related to materials or computational physics, what kinds of undergraduate research experiences would be most valuable?

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
60
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
53
Views
7K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
168
Back
Top