Compton Edge and Gamma Spectroscopy

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the determination of the Compton edge in gamma spectroscopy, specifically focusing on how to quantitatively analyze experimental spectra obtained from gamma sources. Participants explore fitting techniques and theoretical considerations related to Compton scattering.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks guidance on fitting techniques to determine the Compton edge from gamma spectra, mentioning tools like Logger Pro, Excel, and Mathematica.
  • Another participant explains the distinction between the Compton edge and the backscatter peak, providing a theoretical framework for understanding Compton scattering with a cesium-137 photon.
  • A participant expresses uncertainty about how to quantitatively determine the Compton edge from their experimental data, questioning the reliability of a source that suggests a specific method involving the maximum value and its height.
  • One participant suggests using the detector resolution from the cesium gamma line to perform a convolution of the theoretical Compton edge shape, integrating over scattering angles.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the best method for determining the Compton edge from experimental data, with multiple approaches and uncertainties expressed throughout the discussion.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention the need for quantitative analysis beyond visual estimation and highlight challenges in identifying Compton edges when multiple features are present in the spectrum.

zeebo17
Messages
40
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I have measured some spectrums from various gamma sources and I was wondering what kind of fitting I should do to determine the Compton edge. I have access to Logger Pro, Excel, and mathematica. I have fit the photopeak with a Gaussian so I know the uncertainty in the Compton edge, I just need to determine its value.

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Zeebo-
This is a very good question, and there are two answers. One is called Compton edge, and the other is called the backscatter peak.

When a photon backscatters off a free electron, and leaves the detector (e..g, NaI(Tl)), only the energy of the Compton recoil electron remains in the detector (Compton edge). When a photon backscatters in the shielding around the detector, and the backscattered photon is absorbed by the detector, it creates a backscatter peak.

Let's solve this situation for a cesium-137 photon backscattering in or near the detector.

The basic equation for energy balance in Compton scattering is

E'/E0 = [1+α(1-cos(θ)]-1

where E' is scattered photon energy, E0 = 661 keV, α= E0/mc2 = 661/511 = 1.29, and θ = scattering energy.

So for this case, θ = 180 degrees,

E'/E0= [1+ 2.58]-1 = 0.28

So the backscattered photon is 0.28*661 = 185 KeV, (backscatter peak) and

Eelectron = 661 - 185 = 476 KeV (Compton edge)

Bob S
 
Sorry, I should have been clearer. I know the theoretical values for the various spectral features, but I was wondering how to determine my experimental result from the spectrum I have taken (Something more quantitative then eye-balling it).

I had seen some things that said the edge was half way between the maximum value (near the edge) and half of the height of this maximum. But I'm not sure how trustworthy this source is.

I'm also not sure how to find the Compton edges when there are two right next to each other.

Thanks for your help!
 
You know the detector resolution from the width of the cesium gamma line (661 KeV). So you can do a convolution of the theoretical Compton edge shape (need to integrate over scattering angle) and the detector resolution.
Bob S
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K