Musings of a different academic path

  • Thread starter Thread starter retcon
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Academic Path
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the contemplation of returning to school for a new career path, specifically in the sciences, despite a background in Computer Information Technology. The individual expresses concern about their math skills, which are crucial for fields like physics and chemistry. There is an acknowledgment that higher education in these areas typically requires proficiency in calculus and advanced math concepts. Suggestions include assessing math abilities before committing to a science major and considering starting fresh rather than retrofitting the existing Associate degree. Overall, pursuing a scientific career necessitates a strong foundation in math.
retcon
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
After browsing through a like minded thread in this forum, I too am seriously pondering going back to school to embark on a different career path. I have an Associate degree in Computer Information Technology (translation: garbage) which at the time had an emphasis on C+ (this was prior to the additional PLUS...yes that's how long it's been). Very much would I like to embark on a scientific path, trouble is math has never been my strongsuit.

As a kid you think to yourself, "What good will this equation do me in the real world?" Then the real world smacks you upside the head as close to everything that is intellectually stimulating in the secular world has an intrinsct connection with higher numeric concepts.

Just wondering out loud how difficult it would be to retrofit my AAS degree to a 4 year institution, and pursue further degrees in physics and/or chemistry?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you need to take some calculus courses and see if you develop skill in math. If you cannot, then I would suggest steering away from physics and chemistry.

Essentially, saying that you want to major in physics but have no skill in math is like saying you want to be an army sniper but abhor violence.
 
By the way, I would not worry about retrofitting your AAS degree. I would consider that in the past and start anew.
 
So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks
I am attempting to use a Raman TruScan with a 785 nm laser to read a material for identification purposes. The material causes too much fluorescence and doesn’t not produce a good signal. However another lab is able to produce a good signal consistently using the same Raman model and sample material. What would be the reason for the different results between instruments?
Back
Top