Short duration amperage vs. wire gauge

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around optimizing wire gauge and amperage for coils in experiments involving solenoids. Participants explore the implications of short-duration loads on wire heating and performance, considering both theoretical and empirical approaches.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Experimental/applied

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks equations or rules-of-thumb for short-duration amperage limits relative to wire gauge, noting that existing guidelines for continuous use seem overly restrictive.
  • Another participant presents a simplified analysis suggesting that heating is related to the magnetic field and cross-sectional area, implying that wire gauge may not significantly affect heating in this context.
  • It is noted that smaller wire gauges have higher resistance, leading to increased heating rates due to power dissipation from the wire's resistance and the current flowing through it.
  • A participant questions the applicability of standard amperage ratings for continuous use to the specific short-duration scenario, suggesting that empirical testing may be necessary.
  • One participant argues that 10-15 minutes should be considered continuous duty, recommending adherence to conservative continuous current ratings, while acknowledging the possibility of exceeding these ratings with caution.
  • Another participant inquires about specific circular mils per amp guidelines, expressing interest in empirical data and the potential for experimentation.
  • A participant shares insights from their optimization program, noting that maximizing wire gauge and layers minimizes power dissipation, while also discussing the complexity of achieving a balance between solenoid mass and required magnetic field strength.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the relevance of continuous duty ratings for short-duration experiments, with some suggesting that established guidelines may not apply, while others advocate for caution based on those ratings. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best approach to determine safe amperage limits for the specific experimental conditions.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge the limitations of existing guidelines and the need for empirical testing to validate assumptions about wire gauge and amperage in short-duration applications. There is also a recognition of the complexity involved in balancing various design parameters.

enigma
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
1,739
Reaction score
20
Hi all,

I'm currently doing some work trying to optimize coils (basically a large center hole solenoid) for a series of experiments.

Two of the variables I'm going to be able to adjust are wire gauge of the coil and amperage through the coil.

Online, I have found 'rule of thumb' amperage limits for continuous use vs. wire gauge. The tests I will be running will not be running for long periods of time (maybe 10-15 minutes tops), and the amperage limits I've looked up online seem to be very limiting.

I'm wondering if anyone knows where I could find equations or rules-of-thumb for short duration loads vs. wire gauge.

We're probably going to have to do some failure tests to be sure, but I'd like to get close before we start winding the coils up (which will be a relatively lengthy process).
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
According to my stupidly simple analysis Heating = k . F^2 / A
where F is the field and A is the solenoid cross section area -- i.e gauge does not matter.
 
Heating is a result of power dissipation - the resistance of the wire and the amperage through the wire. Smaller wires have higher resistances, so their heating rates will be higher.
 
add

smaller guages allow more turns per area hence more field what are you trying to get??
I doubt that the standards quoted apply to your circumstance you may ( heaven forbid) have to estimate it yourself, my suggestion was a back of the envelope calc I'm not claiming 100% accuracy but it's better than your reply.
 
Last edited:
Enigma,

10-15 minutes is long enough to be considered continuous duty. The wire will heat up and reach 90% of its nominal operating temperature in probably a minute or two. If I were you, I would just go by the continuous current ratings. They are indeed conservative. You could probably double the ratings without any real danger, but you'll be losing the safety factor that is necessary for, say, UL certification.

- Warren
 
how many circular mils/amp are these rules-of-thumb? I've seen 200mils or 300mils/amp used as acceptable limits, but no mention of margins of safety.

sounds like time for some empirical data? burning up stuff is almost as fun as blowing stuff up or crushing it... :smile: And once you get a few windings thick so the heat dissipation into the air isn't much of a factor for the inner windings...

Cliff
 
chroot said:
You could probably double the ratings without any real danger, but you'll be losing the safety factor that is necessary for, say, UL certification.

Thanks. That's what I was looking for.

I coded an optimization program. When sizing for minimum power dissipation, the result is a trivial: maximum layers, maximum wire gauge.

I am getting non-trivial results when sizing for minimum solenoid mass assuming that the required field is kicked up fairly high.

rayjohn01 said:
my suggestion was a back of the envelope calc I'm not claiming 100% accuracy but it's better than your reply.

Sorry about that, rayjohn.

I hadn't typed the code up yet, so it just wasn't jiving with what I was expecting. I thought that maybe I wasn't clear with what I was asking, and I was sort of thinking out loud (so to speak). Now that I've played around with it a bit, I get what you were trying to say.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
17
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K