Question About Bloch Oscillation: Understand the Energy

  • Thread starter Thread starter hafsa
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Oscillator
hafsa
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
i have a question concerning BLOCH OSCILLTION.i studied that in the extended zone scheme, the energy of an electron with k=pi/d is same as with k=3 pi/d.
i can't understand this because by dispersion relation as wave vector increases ,energy also increases(in extended zone scheme too)
please help me
 
Physics news on Phys.org
well, if I'm not mistaken, bloch oscillations are based on the assumption that the dispersion relation is periodic [something like - e(k)=B+A*cos(a*k)]. when you derive the speed from this energy [by v=(1/h)*de(k)/dk] you get a sine - a periodic speed.
the reason that the dispersion relation is periodic and not e(k)=h^2*k^2/2m is that the later is true only for free electrons. when dealing with bloch electrons this formula isn't quite right. if you work with the tight binding method you get those periodic e(k) functions.
 
Last edited:
hmm,u mean that in bloch oscillation we are actually apllying bloch theorem also.(by letting n vary,we obtain same energy for different energies of k(wave vector)and there is no role of extended zone scheme here.am i right?
 
sure. and according to bloch's theorem:
\epsilonn(k)=\epsilonn(k+G)
where G is any reciprocal lattice vector.
this means that at the same band (n) the energy is periodic over k.

regarding the extended zone scheme, I am not sure but as far as i understand it will be the same as the repeated-zone scheme (that is the reduced zone repeated).
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Back
Top