Is color added to SEM and TEM images in post-processing?

  • Thread starter Thread starter physicist888
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Images Sem Tem
physicist888
Messages
63
Reaction score
0
I saw in some papers SEM colored images. Does anybody have an idea about the software that may be used?? and how?
thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Although electrons may have different wavelengths or energies, they do not have color as we see it. The images collected in the SEM are more or less intensity maps of electrons being deflected towards a detector. For typical SEM, the detector has a charge that attracts weak electrons. This is what gives SEM images their characteristic look of bright edges and few shadows.

But, if you want to make it colored, you can use EDS that attached in SEM. By using EDS, you can use one method that can make the images colored. That method is dot-mapping. Different element show different color as shown below :

http://kestek.com/images/photomicrograph.gif
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Hi,
May be you can check digital micrograph..
Very long back i used it..but never used for coloring...but now i think they have updated
 
As far as I know, SEM/TEM and other metallogrphic images are for the most part colored artificially. There are programs (software) to do that.

I've looked at metallographs under actual and polarized light. The polarized light produced a somewhat colored image (with different intensities) based on different crystal (grain) orientation, which indicated discrete grain orientation as opposed to continous.
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top