Wave eqtion of electron in a periodic potential

JayKo
Messages
127
Reaction score
0
quoted from Kittel text 8th edition page 170,171
the potential energy is U(x)=\SigmaU_{G}e^{iGx}

but why it is also equal to-> U(x)=\SigmaU_{G}e^{iGx}+e^{-iGx}


from text explanation, i couldn't get it why there is an extra term of e^{iGx}

any 1 care to enlight me on this? thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
JayKo said:
quoted from Kittel text 8th edition page 170,171
the potential energy is U(x)=\SigmaU_{G}e^{iGx}

but why it is also equal to-> U(x)=\SigmaU_{G}e^{iGx}+e^{-iGx}


from text explanation, i couldn't get it why there is an extra term of e^{iGx}

any 1 care to enlight me on this? thanks.

There is an extra term e-iGx to make potential energy U(x) a real function.
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top