| Thread Closed |
Fraunhofer Diffraction Proving |
Share Thread | Thread Tools |
| Sep15-04, 02:53 AM | #1 |
|
|
Fraunhofer Diffraction Proving
I am to prove that in
y = R * m * (wavelength) / a where y is the distance between two minima, a is the width of the slit, R is the length between the screen and the slit grating, and m is an integer which is the order of the minima. I know I have to use the paraxial approximation where tan x is approximately sin x which is approx. x, but I can't seem to apply it. When I refer to my textbooks, they state that y is the difference between the central maximum and the first minimum when m=1. Is this applicable bet. two minima as well? |
| Sep15-04, 07:20 PM | #2 |
|
Recognitions:
|
Start with the condition for constructive interferance;
dsin(theta) = m(lambda) Then apply the small angle approximation. It is quite simple. Your textbook is referring to y as the difference between the first maximum and the centre of the pattern, which is equivalent (within the small angle approximation) to the distance between successive minima. Claude. |
| Thread Closed |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads for: Fraunhofer Diffraction Proving
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | ||
| fraunhofer intensity pattern | Advanced Physics Homework | 0 | ||
| Fraunhofer diffraction | General Physics | 3 | ||
| Incidence angle in a Fraunhofer single slit problem | Introductory Physics Homework | 3 | ||
| fraunhofer diffraction | Advanced Physics Homework | 0 | ||
| fraunhofer diffraction | Advanced Physics Homework | 0 | ||