Register to reply

Fraunhofer Diffraction Proving

by relinquished™
Tags: diffraction, fraunhofer, proving
Share this thread:
Sep15-04, 02:53 AM
P: 79
I am to prove that in

y = R * m * (wavelength) / a

where y is the distance between two minima, a is the width of the slit, R is the length between the screen and the slit grating, and m is an integer which is the order of the minima.

I know I have to use the paraxial approximation where tan x is approximately sin x which is approx. x, but I can't seem to apply it. When I refer to my textbooks, they state that y is the difference between the central maximum and the first minimum when m=1. Is this applicable bet. two minima as well?
Phys.Org News Partner Science news on
'Office life' of bacteria may be their weak spot
Lunar explorers will walk at higher speeds than thought
Philips introduces BlueTouch, PulseRelief control for pain relief
Claude Bile
Sep15-04, 07:20 PM
Sci Advisor
P: 1,477
Start with the condition for constructive interferance;

dsin(theta) = m(lambda)

Then apply the small angle approximation. It is quite simple.

Your textbook is referring to y as the difference between the first maximum and the centre of the pattern, which is equivalent (within the small angle approximation) to the distance between successive minima.


Register to reply

Related Discussions
Fraunhofer intensity pattern Advanced Physics Homework 0
Fraunhofer diffraction General Physics 3
Incidence angle in a Fraunhofer single slit problem Introductory Physics Homework 3
Fraunhofer diffraction Advanced Physics Homework 0
Fraunhofer diffraction Advanced Physics Homework 0