Prove Orthogonality Condition For Sines (Integral)


by maherelharake
Tags: condition, integral, orthogonality, prove, sines
maherelharake
maherelharake is offline
#1
Oct5-10, 02:28 PM
P: 261
1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data

I need to prove the equation attached. I also have to describe why the integrals vanish.


2. Relevant equations



3. The attempt at a solution
I am not sure how to begin. Our teacher told us this equation is known as the orthogonality condition for sines. I also know that n' is a positive integer. I think if I get help starting this I will be able to proceed.
Attached Thumbnails
photo.jpg  
Phys.Org News Partner Science news on Phys.org
Better thermal-imaging lens from waste sulfur
Hackathon team's GoogolPlex gives Siri extra powers
Bright points in Sun's atmosphere mark patterns deep in its interior
╔(σ_σ)╝
╔(σ_σ)╝ is offline
#2
Oct5-10, 02:51 PM
╔(σ_σ)╝'s Avatar
P: 851
Use a trig identity to convert the product to sums.
maherelharake
maherelharake is offline
#3
Oct5-10, 05:29 PM
P: 261
I worked through the integral, but I kept getting zero for all cases. I have attached my work. Any help is appreciated.
Attached Thumbnails
Scan 1.jpg  

╔(σ_σ)╝
╔(σ_σ)╝ is offline
#4
Oct5-10, 09:11 PM
╔(σ_σ)╝'s Avatar
P: 851

Prove Orthogonality Condition For Sines (Integral)


If n=n' you simply have sine squared blah blah... If you integrate it, you will not get zero. This can be intuitively seen from the fact that the graph of sine squared is strictly greater than or equal zero.

If you keep getting zero then something is wrong.
maherelharake
maherelharake is offline
#5
Oct5-10, 09:12 PM
P: 261
Right I understand that completely. I just can't seem to find my mistake. I went over it several times
╔(σ_σ)╝
╔(σ_σ)╝ is offline
#6
Oct5-10, 09:19 PM
╔(σ_σ)╝'s Avatar
P: 851
For the case n=n' don't convert the product to a sum. Just integrate sine square whatever by using the half angle identity for cosine.

EDIT
Double angle not half angle.
maherelharake
maherelharake is offline
#7
Oct5-10, 09:21 PM
P: 261
But in order to prove that, don't I have to integrate regardless? I feel like it's not the right way to do it if I use the idea of n=n' beforehand.
╔(σ_σ)╝
╔(σ_σ)╝ is offline
#8
Oct5-10, 09:27 PM
╔(σ_σ)╝'s Avatar
P: 851
Quote Quote by maherelharake View Post
But in order to prove that, don't I have to integrate regardless? I feel like it's not the right way to do it if I use the idea of n=n' beforehand.
What do you mean ? The question asked you to verify the formula for the two cases. So I see nothing wrong with considering the cases separatly.

What you have done ,thus far, is valid when n'=/=n.

If you look at your solution, when you converted the product to a sum if you let n=n' one of the cosine terms vanish before you integrate. You cannot just plug in n=n' into your final solution because of division by zero :-). Those constants you have in the final step or your solution become infinity when n=n'.

So you have to consider the cases separatly.
maherelharake
maherelharake is offline
#9
Oct5-10, 09:41 PM
P: 261
Hmm I see what you are saying. Well I suppose I will ask the professor if this method is acceptable, and let you know tomorrow. Thanks.
╔(σ_σ)╝
╔(σ_σ)╝ is offline
#10
Oct5-10, 09:44 PM
╔(σ_σ)╝'s Avatar
P: 851
What exactly makes it seem invalid to you?
maherelharake
maherelharake is offline
#11
Oct5-10, 09:51 PM
P: 261
It just kind of seems to me that the teacher phrased the question in a way such that he wants us to completely simplify the left hand side of the equation before we use any of the knowledge on the left. I hope that makes sense in the way I explained it.
╔(σ_σ)╝
╔(σ_σ)╝ is offline
#12
Oct5-10, 09:59 PM
╔(σ_σ)╝'s Avatar
P: 851
That is what we are doing.
The only thing is that if n=n' the method you are using won't work directly.

The reason is what I already pointed out. In your result of your integration you have a 1/(blah(n-n')). If you make n=n' you have a problem with dividing by zero.

This is why we have to consider different cases.
maherelharake
maherelharake is offline
#13
Oct5-10, 10:00 PM
P: 261
Ohhhh I think I see what you are saying now. Ok I will work on it and post what I have done either tonight or tomorrow. Thanks.
╔(σ_σ)╝
╔(σ_σ)╝ is offline
#14
Oct5-10, 10:02 PM
╔(σ_σ)╝'s Avatar
P: 851
No problem :-). Take your time.
maherelharake
maherelharake is offline
#15
Oct7-10, 10:24 AM
P: 261
Got it now. Thanks.
nareto
nareto is offline
#16
Feb3-11, 09:50 AM
P: 7
aargghh why haven't you posted the solution

EDIT: nevermind, I found it here: http://www.mathreference.com/la-xf-four,orth.html and I'm copying it below for reference:

Consider two functions f = sin(mx) and g = sin(nx). Here m and n are distinct positive integers. What is the integral of f×g, as x runs from 0 to 2π?

Use the angle addition formula to write the following trig identity.

sin(mx)×sin(nx) = ˝ ( cos(mx-nx) - cos(mx+nx) )

Integrate the right side from 0 to 2π and get 0. Here are two more identities to demonstrate the orthogonality of cos(mx)×cos(nx) and sin(mx)×cos(nx).

cos(mx)×cos(nx) = ˝ ( cos(mx-nx) + cos(mx+nx) )

sin(mx)×cos(nx) = ˝ ( sin(mx+nx) + sin(mx-nx) )


Register to reply

Related Discussions
Legendre Polynomial Orthogonality Integral Limits Calculus & Beyond Homework 0
Transversality Condition with right end point free, subject to integral constraints Calculus 1
Prove Equality given a condition Precalculus Mathematics Homework 7
Integral of exponential involving sines and cosines Calculus 1
Prove this integral General Math 4