Proving "If f is Simultaneously an Eigenfunction of L^2 & L_z

  • Thread starter Thread starter Funzies
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Notation Spin
Funzies
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
Hello there,
I've got two short questions I was hoping you could help me with:

-I have to prove:
"if f is simulateneously an eigenfunction of L^2 and L_z, the square of the eigenvalue of L_z cannot exceed the eigenvalue of L^2"
He gives a hint that I should evaluate
<f|L^2|f>
But I don't have a clue what he means by this notation?!

-Why does this hold:
<S_x> = \chi^+S_x\chi
I am familiar with calculating <x> by doing:
&lt;x&gt;=\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\psi(x)^*x\psi(x)dx
But I do not understand this different situation. Could you tell me the underlying differences/similarities?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The "S_x" is one of the spin-operators. He has a trivial action in the Hilbert space of angular momentul states. So just forget about the spin, remember what you have to prove.

Another hint would be to connect the square of L_z and the L^2.
 
&lt;f|L^2|f&gt; is dirac notation and is more or less the same as \int_{-\inf}^{\inf}f(x)^*L^2f(x)dx so its essentially the expectation value &lt;L^2&gt; in this case. The difference is, dirac notation does not imply a particular representation for your state function f. When you write f(x), it is referred to as the coordinate representation, ie your state function is a function of position. You could also write your state function as a function of momentum, or whatever else.

In short, the &lt;f|L^2|f&gt; is a more general way to represent the integral you are used to.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Thread 'Lesser Green's function'
The lesser Green's function is defined as: $$G^{<}(t,t')=i\langle C_{\nu}^{\dagger}(t')C_{\nu}(t)\rangle=i\bra{n}C_{\nu}^{\dagger}(t')C_{\nu}(t)\ket{n}$$ where ##\ket{n}## is the many particle ground state. $$G^{<}(t,t')=i\bra{n}e^{iHt'}C_{\nu}^{\dagger}(0)e^{-iHt'}e^{iHt}C_{\nu}(0)e^{-iHt}\ket{n}$$ First consider the case t <t' Define, $$\ket{\alpha}=e^{-iH(t'-t)}C_{\nu}(0)e^{-iHt}\ket{n}$$ $$\ket{\beta}=C_{\nu}(0)e^{-iHt'}\ket{n}$$ $$G^{<}(t,t')=i\bra{\beta}\ket{\alpha}$$ ##\ket{\alpha}##...
Back
Top