Calculating load rating of a pulley stand

AI Thread Summary
A mechanical engineer is seeking advice on calculating the load rating for a conveyor pulley stand designed to support at least 10 tons. The engineer has confirmed that the sections used exceed this load capacity but is looking for specific calculations to verify structural integrity, particularly for the flat bar and UB in compression, and whether to check the bottom channel for compression along the web. A contributor highlights that the weakest point in the design may be the pulley mounting flanges and their connection to member 3, suggesting that widening member 3 could enhance stability against torsional effects. The discussion emphasizes the importance of thorough structural checks before certification.
MechEng87
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi Guys,

I'm a mechanical engineer looking for help with a structural problem, I work on-site at an iron ore mine in Western Australia. Typically once we design stands we get them fabricated then sent for certification. Certification involves a company putting the load which we wish to get the stand rated for on the stand itself, if it doesn't fail it gets a certification plaque.

I was required to design a stand for a conveyor pulley (drawing attached), I want this stand rated for at least 10T. I know the sections I have used will take in excess of 10T but what calculations should I perform as a check? The castors are off the shelf items each with a load rating of 5T so I won't check their structural integrity. My question is what calculations would you perform as a quick check and how do I do them? So far I was thinking I should check the flat bar and UB in compression, what forumlas should I use? Do I need to check the bottom channel for compression along the web?

Is there any other website I should post this query to?

Thanks,
Conor
 

Attachments

Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
Whilst I'm suprised RTZ can't pay for its own structural analysis I would comment that the weak point in the design will be items 6, the pulley mounting flanges and their connection to member 3.

If member 3 were a bit wider then items 6 could be stiffened against torsional effects, that may eventually cause the rather small weld line connection to fail.
Alternatively members 6 could remain flat but be continued down the sides of member 3.

go well
 
Back
Top