Simple relativistic harmonic oscillator

In summary, the conversation discusses the formulation and solution of a simple one dimensional harmonic oscillator in the context of a liquid drop actinide nucleus splitting after absorbing a neutron. The complete model involves multiple modes and highly non-linear behavior of the Hook's Law spring constant. The inertial parameter in nuclear physics is difficult to calculate and approximations are only accurate to within an order of magnitude. The anharmonicities in fission are significant and the system is quantum-mechanical. The conversation also mentions the potential application of the relativistic harmonic oscillator in MeV physics and a discussion on the effect of the speed of light in a strongly optically dispersive medium. However, it is noted that the speed of light in relativity does not change
  • #1
photonist
3
0
In the attached file, I have formulated a simple one dimensional harmonic oscillator and solved the model numerically. Such a model might represent a simple reaction coordinate along which a liquid drop actinide nucleus might split after absorbing a neutron. Clearly the complete model involves multiple modes and highly non-linear behaviour of the Hook's Law spring constant. But at least the approach this problem seems relatively simple.
 

Attachments

  • Formulation and Solution of a Relativistic Harmonic Oscillator.pdf
    111.1 KB · Views: 1,055
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Hi, photonist,

Welcome to PF!

Cool idea! However, I don't think the nuclear-physics application is right.

Fist off, the mass parameter is not going to be the mass defect. This kind of thing is generically known as an "inertial parameter" in nuclear physics, and it is very difficult to calculate. There are various approximations that can be written down for them, based on, e.g., low-amplitude oscillations of a classical, nonviscous liquid drop. But in reality, these approximations are only good to within about an order of magnitude. One reason is that nuclei are superfluid in the ground states. The only thing that really *is* straightforward to calculate is the inertial parameter after scission, which is just what you would expect classically for two separate bodies.

In the case of spontaneous fission, the order-of-magnitude theoretical uncertainty in the inertial parameter swamps any relativistic corrections. The relativistic corrections are quite small, since the fragments are not highly relativistic.

In addition, the anharmonicities are huge, especially when you're talking about fission (as opposed to a simple vibration of the nuclear shape about its equilibrium). Also it's a quantum-mechanical system, not a classical one. And nuclear vibrations at small amplitudes are typically not very highly collective, which means that it isn't really very accurate to think of them as pure shape oscillations; they're more like somewhat coherent superpositions of some small number of different single-particle excitations.

-Ben
 
  • #3
HI Ben:
Thanks for your comments. Generally I agree with you--for one thing, the motion I posit is too simple.

However, the problem is interesting considering that fission in the odd actinides is occasioned by a thermal neutron--the energy gain is tremendous!

It is true that the droplet can be considered a superfluid and the Hook's Law constant is a measure of the separation of the neutron and proton fluid sub-components. But even so, when the thermal neutron is absorbed there has to be a path along a reaction coordinate (just as in chemical kinetics) established from the chaotic motion. A better approach would be to consider just how that is accomplished.

But the reason I looked into this problem was not to contribute to the liquid drop model, but rather to establish for myself a coherent special relativistic account of the harmonic oscillator problem to correct errors I found on the web. The liquid drop model appeared to be a possible case where the oscillator model would apply.

The novel feature of increasing odd harmonics as the maximum potential energy approaches the 'rest' energy suggests a decomposition mode. As the ratio approaches 1, the motion becomes 'unbound' (subject to the caveats mentioned).

Curious.
 
  • #4
Ben:

You've pretty much disposed of fission as a potential candidate for my relativistic harmonic oscillator. There is of course plenty of MeV physics for which such analysis might be useful.

But what about a strongly optically dispersive medium on the short/long wavelength side of the absorption/gain line in which the refractive index can become really large. In effect the speed of light within a certain bandwidth will be greatly slowed. If that were the case, then harmonic oscillator radiators might exhibit 'relativistic' effects based on the local speed of light.
 
  • #5
photonist said:
Ben:

You've pretty much disposed of fission as a potential candidate for my relativistic harmonic oscillator. There is of course plenty of MeV physics for which such analysis might be useful.

But what about a strongly optically dispersive medium on the short/long wavelength side of the absorption/gain line in which the refractive index can become really large. In effect the speed of light within a certain bandwidth will be greatly slowed. If that were the case, then harmonic oscillator radiators might exhibit 'relativistic' effects based on the local speed of light.

The c in relativity doesn't change based on the index of refraction of a medium.

You might be interested in this:

http://gregegan.customer.netspace.net.au/SCIENCE/Rindler/SimpleElasticity.html
 

What is a simple relativistic harmonic oscillator?

A simple relativistic harmonic oscillator is a system where a particle is moving in a potential that follows the laws of special relativity. This means that the energy and momentum of the particle are affected by the particle's speed and the potential it is moving in.

What is the equation of motion for a simple relativistic harmonic oscillator?

The equation of motion for a simple relativistic harmonic oscillator is given by:

where x is the position of the particle, t is time, ω is the frequency of the oscillator, m is the mass of the particle, and γ is the Lorentz factor.

What is the significance of the Lorentz factor in a simple relativistic harmonic oscillator?

The Lorentz factor, γ, is a measure of the particle's speed relative to the speed of light. In a simple relativistic harmonic oscillator, the Lorentz factor affects the energy and momentum of the particle, and therefore, the behavior of the oscillator. As the particle's speed approaches the speed of light, the Lorentz factor becomes larger and the effects of special relativity become more significant.

What is the difference between a classical harmonic oscillator and a relativistic harmonic oscillator?

A classical harmonic oscillator follows the laws of classical mechanics, where the energy and momentum of a particle are not affected by its speed. In contrast, a relativistic harmonic oscillator takes into account the effects of special relativity, where the energy and momentum of a particle are affected by its speed. This results in different equations of motion and behaviors for the two types of oscillators.

What are some real-world applications of the simple relativistic harmonic oscillator?

The simple relativistic harmonic oscillator has applications in fields such as particle physics, where the behavior of particles at high speeds must be taken into account. It can also be used in the study of astrophysics, where the effects of special relativity are important in understanding the behavior of celestial objects. Additionally, the principles of the simple relativistic harmonic oscillator are also used in the development of technologies such as particle accelerators and nuclear reactors.

Similar threads

  • Classical Physics
Replies
1
Views
612
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • Classical Physics
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
8K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
33
Views
4K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Back
Top