New Reply

Eight myths about the brain

 
Share Thread Thread Tools
Jul8-11, 10:57 AM   #1
 
Recognitions:
Science Advisor Science Advisor

Eight myths about the brain


Some may find this interesting:
http://www.sfn.org/skins/main/pdf/ne...th_busters.pdf
Myth: You only use 10 percent of your brain.
Myth: Listening to classical music makes you smarter.
Myth: Vaccines cause autism.
Myth: Brain damage is always permanent.
Myth: Your brain can’t make new cells.
Myth: Drinking alcoholic drinks always kills brain cells.
Myth: Drug use makes holes in your brain.
Myth: Playing games keeps your brain young.

I personally found the last myth the most interesting. They say
"Truth: Crossword puzzles and similar games can help you learn words and improve specific skills, but they won’t enhance overall brain function. If you want to preserve your mental abilities, exercise your body. A healthy diet and regular exercise can help maintain memory and general cognition, particularly later in life. Starting habits that promote healthy cognitive aging early in life can preserve brain function during aging. Studies show that foods rich in nutrients and antioxidants appear to reduce the risks of age-related impairment. Aerobic exercise increases blood flow to the brain, and even lessens the rate of tissue loss during aging."
 
PhysOrg.com
PhysOrg
medical sciences news on PhysOrg.com

>> Obese British man in court fight for surgery
>> 2008 crisis spurred rise in suicides in Europe
>> New food labels dished up to keep Europe healthy
Jul8-11, 11:04 AM   #2
 
Mentor
Blog Entries: 1
None of those surprise me except the forth, that surely depends on the type of brain damage?

As for the last one I'm not even sure what "young" means in this context, senescence is senescence! Though the fad in recent years of brain training games always strikes me as both unethical and effective advertising. Stick a Doctor on the cover then give people gradually improving and flattering results for their scores and you'll sell millions.
 
Jul8-11, 11:12 AM   #3
 
Recognitions:
Science Advisor Science Advisor
I remember seeing something about a study of nuns some years back. I don't remember what the conclusions from that study was though.

Maybe this? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nun_Study
 
Jul8-11, 11:13 AM   #4
 
Mentor
Blog Entries: 1

Eight myths about the brain


Quote by atyy View Post
I remember seeing something about a study of nuns some years back. I don't remember what the conclusions from that study was though.
Interesting contribution You mean for "brain training" games?
 
Jul8-11, 11:22 AM   #5
 
Recognitions:
Science Advisor Science Advisor
Quote by ryan_m_b View Post
Interesting contribution You mean for "brain training" games?
Actually, I'm not familiar with the detailed claims of those games, although I know they exist. I just know of pianists and mathematicians that continue well into old age, and wondered whether that had anything to do with their professions.
 
Jul8-11, 11:27 AM   #6
 
Quote by atyy View Post
Some may find this interesting:
Myth: Listening to classical music makes you smarter.
Listening to classical music probably makes you calmer, similar to meditation .

Myth: Brain damage is always permanent.
Like ryan said, actually depends on the type and extent of damage. But recovery can be there.Take the recent example of senator who was shot in the head.

Myth: Drinking alcoholic drinks always kills brain cells.
Drinking definitely affects the brain and the liver and many more.Of course depends on the amount and the number of years as stated in the article.
 
Jul8-11, 11:29 AM   #7
 
Mentor
Blog Entries: 1
Quote by atyy View Post
Actually, I'm not familiar with the detailed claims of those games, although I know they exist. I just know of pianists and mathematicians that continue well into old age, and wondered whether that had anything to do with their professions.
Many of them claim to improve things such as memory, spatial awareness and the "age" of a brain. They do this by having games based around such things (for example remember the order of coloured flashes then type it back in). The user get's better at the game because they have played it over and over, each time the game tells them their brain age is decreasing and their IQ increasing. It's rubbish, there have never been any studies to show that playing such games boosts your intelligence and brain age isn't even a valid measure.
 
Jul8-11, 12:03 PM   #8
 
Recognitions:
Science Advisor Science Advisor
Quote by ryan_m_b View Post
Many of them claim to improve things such as memory, spatial awareness and the "age" of a brain. They do this by having games based around such things (for example remember the order of coloured flashes then type it back in). The user get's better at the game because they have played it over and over, each time the game tells them their brain age is decreasing and their IQ increasing. It's rubbish, there have never been any studies to show that playing such games boosts your intelligence and brain age isn't even a valid measure.
Ok, I'm switching to Cenegenics (instead of stimulating my mind on PF;)
 
Jul9-11, 12:38 AM   #9
 
Blog Entries: 3
Quote by atyy View Post
Ok, I'm switching to Cenegenics (instead of stimulating my mind on PF;)
well, if your testosterone is low, supplementing might actually increase your spatial ability. and also be stimulating in other ways, such as alleviating depression. i really can't fault guys at all for going the HRT route when they hit manopause.
 
Jul13-11, 03:22 AM   #10
 
There are many more myths available every person have it's own thinking behind the brain.
 
Jul14-11, 09:54 PM   #11
 
Quote by atyy View Post
Myth: Playing games keeps your brain young.
I happened across a game called Dual N Back a while ago that was said to increase fluid intelligence in test subjects who played for 20 days. The title describes the game: dual for 2 stimuli, N back is the number of rounds beofre the current one.

The game is set up like a memory game where participants need to memorize the location of a square in a griid as well as a random [audio] letter each round. the next round they are given new stimuli and must decide whether they match their prievious audio or visual cues.

game link:
http://brainworkshop.sourceforge.net/

link to the relevant study:
http://www.pnas.org/content/early/20...68105.abstract
 
Jul14-11, 10:38 PM   #12
 
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Marijuana kills brain cells. Especially if you don't let the monkey get any oxygen!
 
Jul15-11, 01:34 PM   #13
 
How about this:

Myth 9: The brain is a blank slate and all human behavior is learned.

Thoughts?
 
Jul15-11, 02:29 PM   #14
 
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
CJames, that was Skinner's view, a predominately behavioral view.

The new view that replaces it is ethology. That we can influence a biological system by stimulus somewhat, but it will always be confined within the scope of it's internal dynamics (i.e. genetics/biology).

One thing that's largely glossed over Skinner's view that's not missed in ethological pursuits is the developmental picture. Two fetal biological systems that share exactly the same state in the beginning (say, twins, ignoring random mutations) can develop into very different newborns based simply on the way each twin is connected to their mother's placenta, and how nutrition is distributed between the two twins. We are not starting with two blank slates when they are born.

Of course, this isn't meant to trivialize the role of society in shaping human behavior. Society has a lot of influence... it's just not always an intended result.
 
Jul15-11, 04:32 PM   #15
 
Quote by Pythagorean View Post
CJames, that was Skinner's view, a predominately behavioral view.

The new view that replaces it is ethology. That we can influence a biological system by stimulus somewhat, but it will always be confined within the scope of it's internal dynamics (i.e. genetics/biology).

One thing that's largely glossed over Skinner's view that's not missed in ethological pursuits is the developmental picture. Two fetal biological systems that share exactly the same state in the beginning (say, twins, ignoring random mutations) can develop into very different newborns based simply on the way each twin is connected to their mother's placenta, and how nutrition is distributed between the two twins. We are not starting with two blank slates when they are born.

Of course, this isn't meant to trivialize the role of society in shaping human behavior. Society has a lot of influence... it's just not always an intended result.
Yes, this is what I was getting at, although that's interesting about what's happening in the placenta and how much of an effect it has.
 
Jul16-11, 06:49 AM   #16
 
Mentor
Blog Entries: 1
Quote by CJames View Post
Yes, this is what I was getting at, although that's interesting about what's happening in the placenta and how much of an effect it has.
It will be a long time before we can characterise things like how the developmental processes affect the connectome and how this maps to personality.
 
Jul18-11, 12:55 AM   #17
 
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Yeah, so far all they measure is the degree of difference between monochoriotic and dichoriotic monozygotic twins with personality and intellectual ability tests. Some tests measure a higher degree of difference in the dichoriotic tests.

Intrapair differences in personality and cognitive ability among young monozygotic twins distinguished by chroion type

http://www.springerlink.com/content/yh27747jkx347w64/

Heritability Estimates of Intelligence in Twins:
Effect of Chorion Type

http://www.springerlink.com/content/qq4w6r4883533065/
 
New Reply
Thread Tools


Similar Threads for: Eight myths about the brain
Thread Forum Replies
How did the myths start General Discussion 35
Persistence of myths General Discussion 1
Wart myths General Discussion 30
Science Myths General Discussion 7
Most persistent myths. General Discussion 74