Projectile with Drag and g

  • Thread starter Thread starter sunnyguha
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Drag Projectile
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the dynamics of a sphere thrown upwards, considering both gravitational force and drag. The drag force is defined as 1/2kv^2, while gravity varies with height, expressed as g=g(R/R+h). The user seeks guidance on determining the maximum height and velocity over time, v(t), using the equation for deceleration that includes both drag and gravitational forces. A suggestion is made to assume constant gravity for short distances, simplifying the calculations. Clear communication is encouraged for effective assistance in the forum.
sunnyguha
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I was working on semi-realistic projectile dynamics.

The first thing i took was what if a sphere is thrown upwards.
g wud act downloads and there wud be drag.

Drag=1/2kv^2 (leave k for the moment) (drag depends on v)
g=g(R/R+h) (g depends on h)

projectile is fired upwards with velocity v

How do i then find the max height and v(t).

ma(deacceleration) = 1/2kv^2 + mg(R/R+h)

how do i integrate because both terms are functions of different quantites,

I would really appreciate a step by step answer
thnx :-)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
BTW m new here
Hi All
 
Hello sunnyguha! Welcome to Physics Forums.

First of all, be sure to use regular English here and not texting language. For example, "BTW m new here" should be "By the way, I am new here." Otherwise everyone will just ignore you.

If the distances over which the sphere will travel is on the order of meters, you can assume the acceleration due to Earth's gravity is constant.
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top