2 questions. 1 on Field theory, the other on Ads/CFT.

sox
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
My first question:

QED has U(1) symmetry. The transformation is a function of x (psi -> psi*theta(x)). How does this depend on the spacetime? Do interactions therefore differ between curved space and flat space? Is this what leads on to QFT on curved spacetime research?

My second question:

If we believe that the curvature of spacetime in our universe is positive, why do string theorists like to play around with the Ads/CFT correspondance? Ads is a space with negative curvature is it not? If so, then surely any correspondance between string theory and gauge theory, whilst interesting, is ultimatley incorrect based on the fact that the string theory has been set up in an unphysical space?

Any illumination here would be appreciated.

Sox
 
Physics news on Phys.org
sox said:
Do interactions therefore differ between curved space and flat space? Is this what leads on to QFT on curved spacetime research?
Yes and yes. The interactions are obtained by replacing ordinary derivatives by covariant derivatives, which are nontrivial in curved spacetime.
 
Oh yeah! I had forgotten that the derivative changes in curved spacetime.
Thanks.

Anyone got an answer for the second one?
 
We don't actually believe that spacetime has positive curvature, at least as I understand it; currently, the measurements are consistent with a flat spacetime (no curvature). What you may be confusing this with is the statement that our universe is expanding. That means that it's inflating faster and faster with respect to time, or the second derivative of the size of the universe with respect to time is positive. This is uncorrelated with the curvature of the universe. The cosmological constant does indeed contribute to the expansion rate of the universe, but so do matter and energy.

One could imagine a 4d gauge group that appeared to be (at least approximately) conformal above, say, 10 TeV, but confined below that. That would be dual to AdS space with boundaries (D3-branes or something of the sort). That's one situation in which one could imagine using AdS/CFT in our universe. Also, you could pretend that our universe was in fact AdS, but with a damn big radius of curvature, meaning a 3d CFT would exist at the boundary. This avenue of research is less popular since it's a little less clear what to do to make progress. However, it's certainly an interesting possibility.
 
This is an alert about a claim regarding the standard model, that got a burst of attention in the past two weeks. The original paper came out last year: "The electroweak η_W meson" by Gia Dvali, Archil Kobakhidze, Otari Sakhelashvili (2024) The recent follow-up and other responses are "η_W-meson from topological properties of the electroweak vacuum" by Dvali et al "Hiding in Plain Sight, the electroweak η_W" by Giacomo Cacciapaglia, Francesco Sannino, Jessica Turner "Astrophysical...
Hello everyone, I am seeking to better understand the conceptual foundations and potential consequences of "Two-Time Physics" (2T-physics), as developed by Itzhak Bars and others. My interest was sparked by a recent paper that attempts to explain anomalous results in particle physics (apparent superluminal propagation of virtual photons) within the framework of 2T-physics: Paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.02696 Key quote from the abstract: *"...the problem... can be solved naturally...

Similar threads

Back
Top