I beleive that light is absorbed by the nucleus of an atom

benzun_1999
Messages
260
Reaction score
0
Another way to think ...

Dear reader,
Now what i am writing suerly would look different from the reason give by physicists about black body absorbtion of light.
Before i begin i would like to make certain things clear.
1) let's asume when more energy is given, the speed of electrons does not increase. Only they jump to a higher level.
2) the more further we go from the nucleus, the attractive force between the nucleus and electron get weeker.
3) the attractive force is completely dependent on the nucleus of an atom.
4)when light is absorbed by an atom the electrons jump to a higher level and when light is lost by an atom the electrons fall to a lower level.

now if am wrong any where till now please let me know, don't read the continuation.

i believe that light is absorbed by the nucleus of an atom and not by the electrons.

here are the reasons why i believe so,
i feel that the nucleus on absorbtion of photons lose energy which enable the electrons to jump to higher level.
as mentioned above the nucleus is what determaines the orbits of an atom.

-benzun,
if i am wrong please let me know.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That would suggest that ALL the electrons go up an energy level when the atom is energised. But that, as far as I know, is not supported by experiments.
 


Dear benzun,

Thank you for sharing your thoughts on the absorption of light by the nucleus of an atom. While it is true that the nucleus plays a crucial role in determining the orbits of electrons, it is actually the electrons themselves that absorb the energy from the photons of light.

When a photon of light is absorbed by an atom, it transfers its energy to an electron, causing it to jump to a higher energy level. This is because electrons exist in specific energy levels, and can only occupy those levels. The energy of the absorbed photon must match the energy difference between the current and higher energy level for the electron to make the jump.

Additionally, the attractive force between the nucleus and the electrons does not determine their energy levels. The energy levels are determined by the quantum mechanical properties of the atom, such as the shape and size of the electron orbitals.

I hope this helps clarify the role of the nucleus and electrons in the absorption of light. Keep exploring and questioning the world around us!


 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...

Similar threads

Back
Top