Why does the model interaction for Cooper pairs make sense?


by sam_bell
Tags: cooper, interaction, model, pairs, sense
sam_bell
sam_bell is offline
#1
Apr27-13, 05:42 PM
P: 67
Hi All,

I am trying to understand why Cooper pairs form. The textbook proof that I am reading (Grosso & Parravicini) starts out as follows: Imagine a 'passive' electron gas filled out to some Fermi sphere kF. Add two 'extra' electrons that interact via a potential U(x-x'). Transform to k-space and take the interaction U_kk' to be attractive within a narrow window of width hωD/2pi above the Fermi sphere. This is the part where I don't follow. Why is this reasonable? Why does this make sense?

Any insights or helpful leads would be appreciated.

Thanks,
Sam
Phys.Org News Partner Physics news on Phys.org
Vacuum ultraviolet lamp of the future created in Japan
Understanding the energy and charge transfer of ions passing through membranes
High-temperature plasmonics eyed for solar, computer innovation
Simon Bridge
Simon Bridge is offline
#2
Apr27-13, 07:42 PM
Homework
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
Thanks ∞
PF Gold
Simon Bridge's Avatar
P: 11,070
Do you mean, "why posit any attraction at all?"
sam_bell
sam_bell is offline
#3
Apr27-13, 08:53 PM
P: 67
No, sorry, I would like to understand why the form given the attraction makes sense. It's beginning to make more sense to me. Would it be fair to say .. The interaction U_kk' for k < kFermi is not operative because of the filled Fermi sea, and not for |Ek-Ek'| >> hωD because no phonons are available to carry the energy discrepancy. Then, for simplicity, we take U_kk' = -U0 (a constant) within the window |Ek - Ek'| < hωD and zero elsewhere.

Simon Bridge
Simon Bridge is offline
#4
Apr27-13, 09:44 PM
Homework
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
Thanks ∞
PF Gold
Simon Bridge's Avatar
P: 11,070

Why does the model interaction for Cooper pairs make sense?


That's right - remember the context is of very low temperatures so all the lower energy levels are filled.

Note: the author is simplifying the situation in the hopes that this will help you imagine the situation.
If you continue to have trouble with this, you may be well advised to find another author who uses a different approach.


Register to reply

Related Discussions
Making Cooper Pairs of Cooper Pairs? Atomic, Solid State, Comp. Physics 4
Potential between Cooper pairs Atomic, Solid State, Comp. Physics 2
Cooper pairs and BCS Atomic, Solid State, Comp. Physics 2
cooper pairs Atomic, Solid State, Comp. Physics 2