Why Is Total Mass Used as the Denominator in the Center of Mass Equation?

AI Thread Summary
The center of mass equation uses total mass as the denominator to calculate a weighted average of the positions of all mass components in a system. This approach ensures that each mass contributes proportionally to its position, reflecting the overall distribution of mass. The suggestion to use a component-specific total mass misinterprets the nature of mass as a scalar quantity rather than a vector. Understanding that mass does not have directional components clarifies why the total mass of the system is appropriate for the calculation. The equation effectively represents the balance point of the entire mass distribution.
PsychonautQQ
Messages
781
Reaction score
10
so for the center of mass of an object..

x = (m1x1 + m2x2 + ...) / M total
y = (m1y1 + m2y2 + ...) / M total

how come in this equation the denominator is the total mass of the system? It seems like it would make more sense to have the denominator the total mass in whatever component you are trying to figure out...

i feel like it should be
x = (m1x1 + m2x2 + ...) / Mx total

and though i realize this is wrong i was hoping somebody could see what i think i see and explain where my thinking is wrong.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Simply put, it's a weighted average.
 
Last edited:
Mass is also not a vector quantity (it has no components like a force, for instance).
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field'

Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field'

Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
View full post »

Thread 'Highway: Deriving speed from Doppler shift'

I passed a motorcycle on the highway going the opposite direction. I know I was doing 125/km/h. I estimated that the frequency of his motor dropped by an entire octave, so that's a doubling of the wavelength. My intuition is telling me that's extremely unlikely. I can't actually calculate how fast he was going with just that information, can I? It seems to me, I have to know the absolute frequency of one of those tones, either shifted up or down or unshifted, yes? I tried to mimic the...
View full post »

Similar threads

I A gravity conundrum involving a solid cylinder
Replies
3
Views
2K
Center of Mass (Subtraction over addition)
Replies
7
Views
3K
I Gravity at Earth's poles vs equator
Replies
12
Views
2K
Center of Mass of separating Orbiting Mass
Replies
2
Views
1K
Center of Mass Help: Understanding Concepts & Equations
Replies
4
Views
3K
B What is Mass?
Replies
23
Views
2K
Center of mass and momentum- A question about systems
Replies
25
Views
1K
Calculate the speed and angle of the center of mass before a collision
Replies
3
Views
907
I How does the mass of the wheels affect the car's acceleration?
Replies
15
Views
4K
Gravitational Forces between two masses
Replies
5
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top