A question about Feynman diagrams


by spookyfish
Tags: diagrams, feynman, feynman diagram
spookyfish
spookyfish is offline
#1
Feb27-14, 03:14 PM
P: 28
For a 2nd order electron-positron scattering, the following diagrams are possible:
http://www.quantumdiaries.org/wp-con...p-1024x228.png
My question is: What is the meaning of the right diagram - is a photon created and annihilated instantaneously? how is this possible?
Phys.Org News Partner Physics news on Phys.org
Physicists design quantum switches which can be activated by single photons
'Dressed' laser aimed at clouds may be key to inducing rain, lightning
Higher-order nonlinear optical processes observed using the SACLA X-ray free-electron laser
jk86
jk86 is offline
#2
Feb27-14, 03:33 PM
P: 3
If time is going from left to right, then the diagram on the left means an electron and a positron annihilate and become a photon, which then decays into an electron-positron pair. The diagram on the right shows an electron and positron exchanging a photon.
spookyfish
spookyfish is offline
#3
Feb27-14, 03:36 PM
P: 28
yes, but this photon exchange (for the diagram on the right) - does it happen instantaneously?

jk86
jk86 is offline
#4
Feb27-14, 03:47 PM
P: 3

A question about Feynman diagrams


No that does not mean it happens instantaneously. The "axes" on the Feynman diagrams should not be taken too literally. For example, many diagrams are drawn with exchanged particles following curved paths, but this does not mean that it actually does this.
Bill_K
Bill_K is online now
#5
Feb27-14, 04:02 PM
Sci Advisor
Thanks
Bill_K's Avatar
P: 3,853
Quote Quote by spookyfish View Post
For a 2nd order electron-positron scattering, the following diagrams are possible:
http://www.quantumdiaries.org/wp-con...p-1024x228.png
My question is: What is the meaning of the right diagram - is a photon created and annihilated instantaneously? how is this possible?
In calculating the Feynman amplitude, both ends of the photon line are integrated over. That will include all cases: t1 < t2, t1 > t2, and t1 = t2.
ChrisVer
ChrisVer is offline
#6
Feb27-14, 04:24 PM
P: 369
The cliche thing that answers this question is that Feynman diagrams don't show the real physical process that takes place, but instead give us a nice insight in order to calculate amplitudes of different processes.
In that sense, the above diagrams do give you information on annihilation and scattering... However what happens in real is what you really measure, and that's the amplitudes (or better the cross section), which the diagrams allow you to easily calculate.
dauto
dauto is offline
#7
Feb27-14, 04:26 PM
P: 1,253
This is a virtual photon. It can travel faster than light.
spookyfish
spookyfish is offline
#8
Feb27-14, 05:04 PM
P: 28
I see. Thank you all
spookyfish
spookyfish is offline
#9
Feb27-14, 05:17 PM
P: 28
Actually, it looks like the diagrams would be the same if one of them is rotated by 90 degrees. Since timing (which event precedes which) doesn't matter, shouldn't they be identical?
ChrisVer
ChrisVer is offline
#10
Feb27-14, 05:39 PM
P: 369
formally they are identical (the term describing the process in the Lagrangian is the same, the coupling strengths are the same).
Physically they describe something different. The one is annihilation and the other is electromagnetic scattering.
spookyfish
spookyfish is offline
#11
Feb27-14, 05:45 PM
P: 28
but then isn't it mathematically counting twice? if topologically the diagrams are indistinguishable (since rotating does not change the topology) and we are counting both diagrams
ChrisVer
ChrisVer is offline
#12
Feb27-14, 05:50 PM
P: 369
you have to count them in if you don't know what process is taking place... For example if someone told you to calculate the cross section of an electron and positron, in that case you'd have to take both diagrams in consideration...
The same thing you'd do if you had 2 identical particles (two possible configurations)
spookyfish
spookyfish is offline
#13
Feb27-14, 06:16 PM
P: 28
ok, but what makes them distinguishable topologically? is it the fact that when we rotate them it's not exactly the same diagram but rather electron is switched with a positron? otherwise, if it is exactly the same, I could for example rotate the diagram in 45 degrees. the process would be the same (only timing of the events are different) and we would count the diagram again. for each rotation we would have a different diagram...
I'm sure it doesn't work this way, I just want to understand
The_Duck
The_Duck is offline
#14
Feb27-14, 07:52 PM
P: 790
When deciding whether two diagrams are "distinguishable", you can't move the external legs, only the internal lines.
ChrisVer
ChrisVer is offline
#15
Feb28-14, 03:40 AM
P: 369
No. you can do the rotation on your paper for an artistic reason, nothing would change the process in the end.
daca
daca is offline
#16
Mar22-14, 06:05 PM
P: 2
The two diagrams represents two possible channels for the e- e+ interaction. In both, the photon represents a virtual particle (mediator of electromagnetic interaction), then, due to the photon is virtual it can't satisfy the energy-momentum relation. Indeed, remember that into the QFT the propagators are two point functions.


Register to reply

Related Discussions
question about feynman diagrams with the integral Quantum Physics 3
Elementary question on Moller Scattering Feynman diagrams High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics 2
another question on Feynman diagrams High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics 0
Basic question about Feynman Diagrams High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics 7
Short question: Spontaneous emission from Feynman diagrams? Quantum Physics 1