Register to reply 
Another question from Srednicki's QFT book. 
Share this thread: 
#1
Jul1614, 09:39 AM

P: 3,220

Sorry for my questions, (it does seem like QFT triggers quite a lot of questions :D).
Anyway, on page 103 (it has a preview in google books), I am not sure how did he get equation (14.40), obviously it should follow from (14.39), but I don't understand where did ln(m^2) disappear ? Shouldn't we have an expression like (14.40) but the term (linear in k^2 and m^2) be instead: (linear in k^2,m^2 and ln(m^2)). Cause as far as I can tell from (14.39) [tex]\Pi(k^2)[/tex] depends also on ln(m^2), and thus the term "linear in..." should be replaced with "linear also in ln(m^2)", cause as far as I can tell ln(m^2) isn't linear function of m^2, right? Hope someone can enlighten me. 


#2
Jul1814, 04:19 AM

P: 754

No that's not possibly the case, because even if you have the [itex] \ln (m^{2}) [/itex] it's multiplied with a [itex]D[/itex].. After integration of [itex]D dx [/itex] you will get [itex](k^{2}+m^{2})ln(m^{2})/6[/itex]
so I think the [itex]ln(m^{2})[/itex] is absorbed within the [itex]κ_{A,B}[/itex] But I hope someone can be more helpful 


#3
Jul1814, 01:42 PM

P: 3,220

Actually the integral on Ddx yields 1/6 k^2 +m^2, it's written previously.



#4
Jul1814, 01:45 PM

P: 754

Another question from Srednicki's QFT book.
and that's what I've written? I just didn't take in account the minus from the ln....Ah yes, you are write, just put a 6 in front of m^2 then



#5
Jul1814, 02:59 PM

P: 3,220

I think the task of solving the problem of mass gap from clay institute which relates to QFT looks a lot more intimidating as I keep reading. :D



#6
Jul2014, 04:43 AM

Sci Advisor
P: 303

The mass gap problem is essentially that you have to prove YangMills exists and after you have done that, you must prove it describes massive particles (rather than massless ones as you would naively think from the Lagrangian). So, yes it is very difficult!



#7
Jul2114, 01:36 AM

P: 3,220

Ok, I plan to ask all of my questions from QFT books here (if the moderators want to include my other posts into this thread it's ok by me, but make it chronological orderd (or as we say use the timeordering operator).



#8
Jul2114, 01:49 AM

P: 3,220

In this case we don't have a book preview of pages 166167 .
So I'll write the equations: [tex](27.23) ln \mathcal{T}^2_{obs} = C_1+2ln \alpha +3\alpha (ln \mu +C_2)+O(\alpha^2)[/tex] Now he says that "Differentiating wrt ln \mu then gives": [tex](27.24)0=\frac{d}{dln \mu} ln \mathcal{T}^2_{obs} = \frac{2}{\alpha} \frac{d\alpha}{dln \mu} +3\alpha +O(\alpha^2) [/tex] Now as far as I can tell when you differentiate: [tex]\frac{d}{dln \mu} (3\alpha(ln \mu +C_2))=3\alpha + 3 \frac{d\alpha}{dln \mu} (ln \mu +C_2)[/tex] so where did [tex]3 \frac{d\alpha}{dln \mu} ln \mu[/tex] disapper from eq. (27.24)? Don't see why he didn't include this term in eq. (27.24). Anyone? 


Register to reply 
Related Discussions  
Ward Identity in Srednicki QFT book  Quantum Physics  0  
Questions in Srednicki's book  Quantum Physics  9  
Irreducible graphs and srednicki's book  Quantum Physics  3  
An integral in Srednicki's book  Quantum Physics  4  
Srednicki's QFT book  High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics  1 