In mathematics, a manifold is a topological space that locally resembles Euclidean space near each point. More precisely, an n-dimensional manifold, or n-manifold for short, is a topological space with the property that each point has a neighborhood that is homeomorphic to an open subset of n-dimensional Euclidean space.
One-dimensional manifolds include lines and circles, but not figure eights. Two-dimensional manifolds are also called surfaces. Examples include the plane, the sphere, and the torus, and also the Klein bottle and real projective plane.
The concept of a manifold is central to many parts of geometry and modern mathematical physics because it allows complicated structures to be described in terms of well-understood topological properties of simpler spaces. Manifolds naturally arise as solution sets of systems of equations and as graphs of functions. The concept has applications in computer-graphics and augmented-reality given the need to associate pictures (texture) to coordinates (e.g. CT scans).
Manifolds can be equipped with additional structure. One important class of manifolds are differentiable manifolds; their differentiable structure allows calculus to be done. A Riemannian metric on a manifold allows distances and angles to be measured. Symplectic manifolds serve as the phase spaces in the Hamiltonian formalism of classical mechanics, while four-dimensional Lorentzian manifolds model spacetime in general relativity.
The study of manifolds requires working knowledge of calculus and topology.
I've been reading up on the definition of a tangent bundle, partially with an aim of gaining a deeper understanding of the formulation of Lagrangian mechanics, and there are a few things that I'm a little unclear about.
From what I've read the tangent bundle is defined as the disjoint union of...
Let $f:\mathbf R^n\to\mathbf R^m$ be a smooth function of constant rank $r$.
Let $\mathbf a\in \mathbf R^n$ be such that $f(\mathbf a)=\mathbf 0$.
Then $f^{-1}(\mathbf 0)$ is a manifold of dimension $n-r$ in $\mathbf R^n$.
We imitate the proof of Lemma 1 on pg 11 in Topology From A...
Hello : let be a differential manifold C^{\infty} : M of dimension n.
I choose a point p.
In this point I can defined the tangent space. It's a vectoirial space of dimension n, I'll talk about it in a precedent thread, .
This space is in bijection with the derivation space : each derivation...
In Nakahara's book, "Geometry, Topology and Physics" he states that it is, by construction, clear from the definition of a vector as a differential operator [itex] X[\itex] acting on some function [itex]f:M\rightarrow\mathbb{R}[\itex] at a point [itex]p\in M[\itex] (where [itex]M[\itex] is an...
I am currently working through Nakahara's book, "Geometry, Topology and Physics", and have reached the stage at looking at calculus on manifolds. In the book he states that "The differentiability of a function f:M\rightarrow N is independent of the coordinate chart that we use". He shows this is...
I'm trying to understand what exactly it means by some tensor field to be 'well-defined' on a manifold. I'm looking at some informal definition of a manifold taken to be composed of open sets ##U_{i}##, and each patch has different coordinates.
The text I'm looking at then talks about how in...
Hi, this is just a review exercise. Let M,N be n- and m- manifolds respectfully , so that the product manifold MxN is orientable. I want to show that both M,N are orientable.
I could do some computations with product open sets of ##\mathbb R^n ## , or work with orientation double-covers...
Hi all,
Could anyone please clarify something for me. PCA of a data matrix X results in a lower dimensional representation Y through a linear projection to the lower dimensional domain, i.e Y=PX. Where rows of P are the eigenvectors of X. From a pure terminology point of view is it correct...
Consider a flat Robertson-Walker metric.
When we say that there is a singularity at
$$t=0$$
Clearly it is a coordinate dependent statement. So it is a "candidate" singularity.
In principle there is "another coordinate system" in which the corresponding metric has no singularity as we...
Hi All,
I am trying to figure out the details on giving a surface S a hyperbolic metric with geodesic boundary, i.e., a metric of constant sectional curvature -1 so that the (manifold) boundary components, i.e., a collection of disjoint simple-closed curves are geodesics under this metric. So...
In a Google image search image search for "Ricci Flat manifolds" I came up with Calabi-Yau manifolds for dummies at,
http://universe-review.ca/R15-26-CalabiYau01.htm
Lots of pictures and important terms.
Other good stuff there as well, click on home button.
What can a complex manifold of dimension N do for me that real manifolds of dimension 2N can't.
Edit, I guess the list might be long but consider only the main features.
Thanks for any help or pointers!
Is it true that the atlas for a torus can consist of a single map while the atlas for a sphere requires at least two maps?
Can we ever get by with a single map for some Calabi–Yau manifolds assuming that question makes sense? If not is there some maximum number required?
Thanks for any help!
Suppose that we have this metric and want to find null paths:
ds^2=-dt^2+dx^2
We can easily treat dt and dx "like" differentials in calculus and obtain for $$ds=0$$
dx=\pm dt \to x=\pm t
Now switch to the more abstract and rigorous one-forms in differentiable manifolds.
Here \mathrm{d}t (v)...
Suppose that we have this metric and want to find null paths:
ds^2=-dt^2+dx^2
We can easily treat dt and dx "like" differentials in calculus and obtain for $$ds=0$$
dx=\pm dt \to x=\pm t
Now switch to the more abstract and rigorous one-forms in differentiable manifolds.
Here \mathrm{d}t (v)...
Let n <= m and G:=Gr(n,m) be the (real) Grassmanian manifold. I understand the topology of the simplest case, that of projective space, and am wondering if there is a way to interpret the topology of the G to similar to projective space, with the according generalizations needed.
If V^n is an...
Some words before the question.
For two smooth manifolds M and P It is true that
T(M\times P)\simeq TM\times TP
If I have local coordinates \lambda on M and q on P then (\lambda, q) are local coordinates on M\times P (right?). This means that in these local coordinates the tanget vectors are...
Homework Statement
I am confused if there is any standard way to check what should be the line element $$ds^{2}$$ when the dimensions are more than three ( since we don't have the option to draw things as we usually do in case of 3d or less dimensional cases. I am following Hobson's book. I am...
Hello,
I want to have a basic understanding. When we speak 10 dimension in String Theory, do we mention:
(a) The six dimension of Calabu Yau manifold and
(4) the four dimension space-time?
Can somebody explain to me what is a manifold.Also what it means for a space to be curved and how we define curvature.I know that a sphere is a curved 2d object, can a curved 3d object live in 3-dimensional space?
Hi, I have an exercise whose solution seems too simple; please double-check my work:
We have a product manifold MxN, and want to show that if w is a k-form in M and
w' is a k-form in N, then ##(w \bigoplus w')(X,Y)## , for vector fields X,Y in M,N respectively,
is a k-form in MxN.
I am...
While reading about sheaves, I came across a beautiful definition of a manifold. An ##n##-manifold is simply a locally ringed space which is locally isomorphic to a subset of ##(\mathbb{R}^n, C^0)##. However, I don't see how this guarantees a manifold to be Hausdorff. Would someone please...
Is it possible for a riemann manifold to change its curvature?
In practice could the universe in general change its curvature by time? (let's say in the past it was negative and today it's almost flat tending to positive);
If not which theorem disproves it?
On the spacetime manifold in general relativity, one chooses a basis at a point and express it by the partial derivatives with respect to the four coordinates in the coordinate system. And then the basis vectors in the dual space will be the differentials of the coordinates. Why do one do that...
I k-foliation of a ##n##-manifold ##M## is a collection of disjoint, non-empty, submanifolds who's union is ##M##, such that we can find a chart ##(U,x^1, \ldots mx^k, y^{k+1}, \ldots, y^n)=(\phi, (x^\mu, y^\nu))## about any point with the property that setting the ##n-k## last coordinates equal...
"2D slice of a 6D Calabi-Yau manifold", and other?
Mathematically what does it mean to take a "2D slice of a 6D Calabi-Yau manifold"?
Part of quote taken from the top of,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Calabi%E2%80%93Yau_manifold
Is there a finite number of slices of a 6D Calabi-Yau manifold...
According to Isham (Differential Geometry for Physics) at page 115 he claims:
"If X is a complete vector field then V can always be chosen to be the entire manifold M"
where V is an open subset of a manifold M. He leaves this claim unproved.
A complete vector field is a vector field which...
Hi friends,
I was wondering about the following - in GR texts we always see these penrose diagrams and some line representing the horizon and all these timelike , spacelike curves and all that ... but the picture that I have of GR is just that of a smooth 4 manifold endowed with a metric . Can...
I've been trying to prove that the closed unit ball is a manifold with boudnary, using the stereographic projection but I cannot seem to be able to get any progress. Can anyone give me a hint on how to prove it? Thanks in advance :)
Hi
I am working on a robot that has a spinning 3D laser scanner. It rotates about two axis and collects data. In one axis it has full 3D rotation and in another axis it has limit rotation.
Now the read world points collect by this laser scanner is not unifomaly distributed but if...
Left invariant fields on a group G satisfies a lie algebra; say we have an n-dimensional Lie algebra for which the fields ##{X_1, \ldots , X_n}## is a basis. Let these satisfy the algebra ##[X_a, X_b] = c_{ab}^c X_c##. Suppose now that we have a Riemannian manifold with killing vectors...
I've been away from the forum for a while working on an interesting project developing an open source visualization system for spatial manifolds that have four dimensions. I have two primary lines of questioning that stem from this work.
1) I know that Gerris is an open source solution for...
In the definition of smooth manifolds we require that the transition functions between different charts be infinitely differentiable (a circle is an example of such a manifold). Topological manifolds, however, does not require transitions functions to be smooth (or rather no transition functions...
Suppose we have a pseudo-riemannian 4 manifold S (sometimes also called a Minkowskian manifold) that is without boundary, and not simply connected. Suppose there is at least one pseudo-riemannian 4 manifold M (also without boundary) that has S as a regular submanifold, preserving all geometry...
By the well-known Whitney embedding theorem, any manifold can be embedded in \mathbb R^n.
You might have also heard the Nash embedding theorem, which basically says that this is still true for Riemannian manifolds (i.e. now we demand the metric is induced from \mathbb R^n).
So fine, any...
Broad title, but really a specific question that I thought should be straightforward, but got stuck.
Consider the geodesics of form t=contant, r>R, in exterior SC geometry in SC coordinates. These are spacelike geodesics. If we consider this geometry embedded in Kruskal geometry, it is easy to...
The usual definition of an n-dimensional topological manifold M is a topological space which is 'locally Euclidean', by which we mean that:
(1) every point in M is contained in an open set which is homeomorphic to ##\mathbb{R}^n##.
(2) M is second countable.
(3) M is an Hausdorff space...
Hi, All:
Say S is a submanifold of an ambient, oriented manifold M; M is embedded in some R^k;
let ## w_m ## be an orientation form for M.
I'm trying to see under what conditions I can orient S , by contracting ## w_m ## , i.e., by
using the interior product with the "right" vector...
Hi so I was just wondering if the metric g=diag(-e^{iat},e^{ibx},e^{icy}) (where a,b,c are free parameters and t,x,y are coordinates) corresponds to a complex manifold (or is nonsensical), and what the manifold looks like?
Our professor's notes say that "In general, in Hamiltonian dynamics a constant of motion will reduce the dimension of the phase space by two dimensions, not just one as it does in Lagrangian dynamics." To demonstrate this, he uses the central force Hamiltonian...
Sorry if this question seems too trivial for this forum.
A grad student at my university told me that a compact Riemannian manifold always has lower and upper curvature bounds.
Is this really true? The problem seems to be that I don't fully understand the curvature tensor's continuity etc...
Hello,
I have troubles formulating this question properly. So I will explain it through one example.
If we consider the Lie group R=SO(2) of rotations on the plane, we know that we can find a manifold on which the group SO(2) acts regularly: this manifold is the unit circle in ℝ2. In fact...
Hello,
I read from several sources the statement that the set of points M\inℝ2 given by (t, \, |t|^2) is an example of differentiable manifold of class C1 but not C2.
Is that true?
To be honest, that statement does not convince me completely, because in order for M to be a manifold, we should...
Originally I asked on another thread whether the GR effects on light can be described as light passing through a medium of varying density- so exerting its effects by refraction.
A.T. kindly posted the following links:
http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn24289#.UlsOR-B3Zmh...
I want to be able to formulate x^{n} coordinate system.
x^{n} =(x^{1}, x^{2}, x^{3}, x^{4})
How do you do this when the Riemann Manifold is not rectangular or spherical?
Also how do you differentiate with respect to "s" in that case.
\frac{dx^n}{ds}
Mod note: Posts split off from https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?p=4468795
Hi, WN, might the OP be referring to GR instead of SR, more specifically to the expanding FRW universe in which it is impossible to even consider the notion of exansion without agreeing about an "everywhere...
I understand that SR and GR should not be dependent on the coordinate system. But does GR depend on the existence of a manifold? As I recall, GR is formulated with a metric tensor. And tensors are only defined on manifold. Or is there a manifold independent GR?
Consider a discrete set of ##k## points.
First, is it a manifold? I know that a manifold is a topological space that contains a neighborhood homeomorphic to Euclidean space for each point. Can we just consider each point's neighborhood to be a set containing only that point?
Second, would the...