A plane releases a water bomb after reaching a certain altitude. Find Angle

In summary, the bomb released by the airplane will travel 3.25km towards the ground after being released.
  • #1
LadyMario
27
0
1. A plane has a velocity of 280 m/s at an angle θ below the horizontal. When the altitude of the aircraft is 2.15km, it releases a water bomb, which subsequently hits a target on the ground. The magnitude of the displacement from the point of release of the bomb to the target is 3.25km. Find angle θ

Please help! I've tried drawing the diagram and even that is ending up confusing. I'm quite sure the second triangle coming off the airplane has a y component of 2.15km, and a hypotenuse of 3.25km but I can't determine how the θ of the plane from the horizontal relates to this second triangle.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
A plane capable of doing a substantial fraction of the speed of sound being used for water bombing? Hm.

From your description of your diagram, I think you are assuming that the bomb travels in a straight line after being released. This isn't the case - it curves towards the ground. You've been given initial velocities in the horizontal and vertical directions (in terms of θ) and distances traveled in the horizontal and vertical directions after some time. Can you relate these pieces of information?
 
  • #3
Ibix said:
A plane capable of doing a substantial fraction of the speed of sound being used for water bombing? Hm.

From your description of your diagram, I think you are assuming that the bomb travels in a straight line after being released. This isn't the case - it curves towards the ground. You've been given initial velocities in the horizontal and vertical directions (in terms of θ) and distances traveled in the horizontal and vertical directions after some time. Can you relate these pieces of information?

I think the problem is stating that if you would draw a direct line from where the bomb was dropped to where it landed it would have traveled 3.25km, not saying the total distance the bomb traveled. From the way he is describing it it seems like it would be possible to solve it by using trigonometry, like a vector problem
 
  • #4
szimmy said:
I think the problem is stating that if you would draw a direct line from where the bomb was dropped to where it landed it would have traveled 3.25km, not saying the total distance the bomb traveled. From the way he is describing it it seems like it would be possible to solve it by using trigonometry, like a vector problem

Yeah that's what I'm trying to do, but I just can't seem to figure it out.
 
  • #5
LadyMario said:
Yeah that's what I'm trying to do, but I just can't seem to figure it out.

Just set up your triangle, with the hypotenuse and the y component, then depending on how you draw it use either arcsin(if you made y opposite theta) or acrcos (if you made it adjacent) to solve for theta
 
  • #6
I'm trying to but I can't figure out where to put theta in my new triangle. I'll insert a pic of what I THINK it looks like:

IMG_1425.jpg


It's kind of blurry but it wouldn't focus, sorry. Hopefully you get the gist of it
 
  • #7
I read the problem as saying that 3.25km is the horizontal distance, not the hypotenuse. In any case, the point is that the bomb does not follow the hypotenuse to the target. In your diagram, the pilot has pointed the nose of the plane at the target and released the bomb. If he doesn't change course, he will fly into the target and the bomb, dropping downwards under gravity, will drop short.

In other words, theta is not the angle you appear to think that it is. You need to think about the motion of the bomb, not the plane.

Perhaps a simpler question: if the plane were traveling horizontally at 280m/s at 2.15km altitude and released its bomb, how far along the ground would the bomb travel?
 
  • #8
I figured it out. It ends up as projectile motion with an initial velocity, thanks :)
 
  • #10
LadyMario said:
I figured it out. It ends up as projectile motion with an initial velocity, thanks :)


I am working on the same problem. When you do the problem, did you have to solve for time in order to be able to move forward in the question?
 
  • #11
Yes but you'll get an expression with theta in it, not a numerical value
 
  • #12
What equation did you use to start?
 
  • #13
V=d/t
 
  • #14
I solved the question for myself, but I am wondering if I have done it properly. Mind if I ask what your answer was? I got 48 degrees
 
  • #15
Knowns=x, y , u and g.
Unknowns=θ

Taking downward as positive.
[itex]y=xTan\theta+\frac{gx^2}{2u^2Cos^2\theta}[/itex]

Cos2θ=1-Sin2θ
1/Cos2=1+tan2θ
 
Last edited:
  • #16
azizlwl said:
Knowns=x, y , u and g.
Unknowns=θ

Taking downward as positive.
[itex]y=xTan\theta+\frac{gx^2}{2u^2Cos^2\theta}[/itex]

Cos2θ=1-Sin2θ
1/Cos2=1+tan2θ

azizlwl can you please elaborate?
 
  • #17
y=vyt + 1/2 at2 ...(1)
x=vxt => t=x/vx...(2)

Sub (2) to (1)

y=vy(x/vx) + 1/2 a(x/vx)2
y=xTanθ+1/2 a(x/vCosθ)2
 
  • #18
Ok I understand how you formulated this equation. Now I can plug my numbers in and I get

y=xTanθ+1/2 a(x/vCosθ)2

2150 = 3250Tanθ + 9.8(3250)2) / 2(280)2cos2θ

How do I get rid of the tan and cos?
 
  • #19
McDonell said:
Ok I understand how you formulated this equation. Now I can plug my numbers in and I get

y=xTanθ+1/2 a(x/vCosθ)2

2150 = 3250Tanθ + 9.8(3250)2) / 2(280)2cos2θ

How do I get rid of the tan and cos?

azizlwl said:
Knowns=x, y , u and g.
Unknowns=θ

Taking downward as positive.
[itex]y=xTan\theta+\frac{gx^2}{2u^2Cos^2\theta}[/itex]

Cos2θ=1-Sin2θ
1/Cos2=1+tan2θ


Just subtitute 1/Cosθ2 with 1+tan2θ then you have a quadratic equation.
 
  • #20
Azizlwl's got it right, solve that using trig identities he stated below.

As for my answer, I got θ=23°
 
  • #21
azizlwl said:
Just subtitute 1/Cosθ2 with 1+tan2θ then you have a quadratic equation.

LadyMario said:
Azizlwl's got it right, solve that using trig identities he stated below.

As for my answer, I got θ=23°

for your Quadratic Equation did you get

660.2Tan2θ + 3250Tanθ - 1489.8
 
  • #22
My number's were slightly off (within like 1 digit range) So yes
 

1. How is the angle of release determined for a water bomb from a plane?

The angle of release for a water bomb from a plane is determined by several factors, including the desired trajectory of the bomb, wind speed and direction, and the altitude and speed of the plane. It is typically calculated using mathematical equations and simulations to ensure the bomb reaches its intended target accurately.

2. What is the optimal angle for releasing a water bomb from a plane?

The optimal angle for releasing a water bomb from a plane depends on the specific situation and goals of the mission. In general, a shallower angle is more effective for longer distances, while a steeper angle is better for shorter distances. The optimal angle is usually determined through careful calculations and testing.

3. How does the altitude of the plane affect the angle of release for a water bomb?

The altitude of the plane directly affects the angle of release for a water bomb. As the altitude increases, the angle of release must also increase in order for the bomb to reach its target. This is due to the longer distance the bomb must travel before reaching the ground.

4. What happens if the angle of release for a water bomb is incorrect?

If the angle of release for a water bomb is incorrect, it could result in the bomb missing its target or not exploding at the desired location. This could have serious consequences in a military or combat situation, or could simply be a waste of resources in other scenarios. Therefore, it is crucial to carefully calculate and adjust the angle of release to ensure accuracy.

5. Can technology be used to automatically determine the angle of release for a water bomb from a plane?

Yes, technology such as GPS systems and computer simulations can be used to automatically determine the angle of release for a water bomb from a plane. This allows for more precise and efficient release, as well as the ability to adjust the angle in real-time if necessary. However, manual calculations and adjustments are still important for ensuring accuracy and accounting for any unforeseen variables.

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
10K
Back
Top