- #1
qtm912
- 38
- 1
- Homework Statement
- Apply the time reversal operator T to the following plane wave equation: Ψ = exp [i (kx - Et)]
- Relevant Equations
- T[f(t)] = T[f(-t)]
Applying the time reversal operator to the plane wave equation: Ψ = exp [i (kx - Et)]
T[Ψ ] = T{exp [i (kx - Et)]} = exp [i (kx + Et)]
This looks straightforward as I have simply applied the 'relevant equation' however my doubt is in relation to the possible action of operator T on the i in the exponent with which I have assumed the T operator commutes as in this case the i seems to be just a number. But elsewhere in my QM course it was proven that T acting on i switches its sign so it anti commutes. Applying this to the equation above it would lead instead to the result :
T[Ψ ] = T{exp [- i (kx + Et)]}
So in the alternative formulation the T operator acts by setting both : t -> -t and i -> -i
Which of these is correct and if both are wrong what is the right answer?
On a related point, if say 'i ' and 't ' appear together as a product in some quantum mechanical expression, following the latter prescription by switching the signs of the product 'i* t' would leave that expression invariant which would imply time reversal invariance wherever they appeared together in such a form. This was another source of doubt in my mind though I suppose some physical quantities are time reversal invariant and it may be a perfectly ok result.
Related question : it was actually shown that T and i anticommute - but this requires us to treat i as a matrix iI and write TiI T^-1
I am therefore quite confused about how to think about all of this.
T[Ψ ] = T{exp [i (kx - Et)]} = exp [i (kx + Et)]
This looks straightforward as I have simply applied the 'relevant equation' however my doubt is in relation to the possible action of operator T on the i in the exponent with which I have assumed the T operator commutes as in this case the i seems to be just a number. But elsewhere in my QM course it was proven that T acting on i switches its sign so it anti commutes. Applying this to the equation above it would lead instead to the result :
T[Ψ ] = T{exp [- i (kx + Et)]}
So in the alternative formulation the T operator acts by setting both : t -> -t and i -> -i
Which of these is correct and if both are wrong what is the right answer?
On a related point, if say 'i ' and 't ' appear together as a product in some quantum mechanical expression, following the latter prescription by switching the signs of the product 'i* t' would leave that expression invariant which would imply time reversal invariance wherever they appeared together in such a form. This was another source of doubt in my mind though I suppose some physical quantities are time reversal invariant and it may be a perfectly ok result.
Related question : it was actually shown that T and i anticommute - but this requires us to treat i as a matrix iI and write TiI T^-1
I am therefore quite confused about how to think about all of this.