I Atomic Structure: Why Does Energy Decrease with Orbit Number?

Aurelius120
Messages
269
Reaction score
24
TL;DR Summary
Why does transition energy decrease with increase in orbit number?
I have read that an electron requires certain minimum energy of threshold frequency to move an orbit

However the energy needed decreases with increase in shell number

The transition energy is reduced with each orbit

For example

The energy to shift an electron from 1st to 2nd orbit is much greater than that required to shift it from 2nd to 3rd (which is greater than from 3rd to 4th and so on)

This is what I don't understand
(Why is it greater)
No one seems to give the right answer

Please explain
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Aurelius120
I have this paperback that will answer your questions:
41beeaKS+BL._SY344_BO1,204,203,200_.jpg

Here's the search I just used to find it:
https://www.amazon.com/dp/0486601153/?tag=pfamazon01-20
Buy used now for $9.88-$14.95
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes Vanadium 50, EigenState137 and berkeman
Look up the energy-level formula for hydrogen, which is the simplest atom. Calculate the energy levels for n = 1, 2, 3, 4. Maybe a few more values of n. Draw an energy-level diagram to scale, using these numbers. You should be able to see the pattern very clearly.

The book shown above almost certainly has a diagram like this. You can also find many similar diagrams (and the formula) with a Google search for "hydrogen energy levels."

If you really meant to ask, "why is the energy-level formula what it is?" then the answer is "solve the time-independent Schrödinger equation (specifically the radial portion) for the hydrogen atom."
 
Thanks a billion
 
Aurelius120 said:
TL;DR Summary: Why does transition energy decrease with increase in orbit number?

I have read that an electron requires certain minimum energy of threshold frequency to move an orbit

However the energy needed decreases with increase in shell number

The transition energy is reduced with each orbit

For example

The energy to shift an electron from 1st to 2nd orbit is much greater than that required to shift it from 2nd to 3rd (which is greater than from 3rd to 4th and so on)

This is what I don't understand
(Why is it greater)
No one seems to give the right answer

Please explain
The more spread out the orbit is the more leverage or influence outside forces have on said orbit...therefore less energy is required to move from one orbit to the next larger one than was required for the prior jump.
 
OdiGeo said:
The more spread out the orbit is the more leverage or influence outside forces have on said orbit...therefore less energy is required to move from one orbit to the next larger one than was required for the prior jump.
That clearly makes no sense since the ratio of bonding strength of orbitals would be the same if the atom were the only atom in the universe.
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top