B Big Bang as the Collapse of a Wave Function

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter f00gass
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Big bang theory
AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores the possibility of the Big Bang being the result of the collapse of a giant wave function, a concept not widely recognized in existing literature. Participants note that while there are speculative ideas about universes emerging from quantum fluctuations, these theories lack substantial scientific backing. The conversation emphasizes that such topics may not be appropriate for deeper scientific forums. Ultimately, the idea remains largely unaddressed in credible sources, suggesting its speculative nature. The thread concludes with a decision to close further discussion on the topic.
f00gass
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I don't have deep knowledge in quantum mechanics, astrophysics, or cosmology. Therefore, I'd like to ask more knowledgeable people. Is there a possibility that the Big Bang, which gave rise to our entire universe, is the result of the collapse of a giant wave function? Or is this theory inherently flawed? I couldn't find any mentions of such an idea online :\
 
Space news on Phys.org
I don't know what this means, but if it's not in the published literature, that says something (and that its not suitable for PF discussion).
 
  • Like
Likes f00gass
f00gass said:
I don't have deep knowledge in quantum mechanics, astrophysics, or cosmology. Therefore, I'd like to ask more knowledgeable people. Is there a possibility that the Big Bang, which gave rise to our entire universe, is the result of the collapse of a giant wave function? Or is this theory inherently flawed? I couldn't find any mentions of such an idea online :\
:welcome:

There are some speculative ideas that a universe could emerge from so-called "quantum fluctuations". If you do an Internet search, you'll find lots of material, nonsensical or otherwise. In any case, here's a popular science summary of the issue:

 
  • Like
Likes f00gass
Vanadium 50 said:
its not suitable for PF discussion
Indeed. Thread closed.
 
Abstract The Event Horizon Telescope (EHT) has significantly advanced our ability to study black holes, achieving unprecedented spatial resolution and revealing horizon-scale structures. Notably, these observations feature a distinctive dark shadow—primarily arising from faint jet emissions—surrounded by a bright photon ring. Anticipated upgrades of the EHT promise substantial improvements in dynamic range, enabling deeper exploration of low-background regions, particularly the inner shadow...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
Title: Can something exist without a cause? If the universe has a cause, what caused that cause? Post Content: Many theories suggest that everything must have a cause, but if that's true, then what caused the first cause? Does something need a cause to exist, or is it possible for existence to be uncaused? I’m exploring this from both a scientific and philosophical perspective and would love to hear insights from physics, cosmology, and philosophy. Are there any theories that explain this?
Back
Top